-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CORE: Inject OAuth2 Token from TableSession #12635
Draft
wolflex888
wants to merge
2
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
wolflex888:inject-token-from-table-session
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think I fully follow why this change is needed. If a REST server supports a sub-scoped table token, then the server would return this via the
token
field inLoadTableResponse#config
and so you would end up having a properly configuredtableSession
(which already takes in thetableConf
with the potentially sub-scoped table token).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we are already getting a
tableSession
that's dedicated to interact with the table from the REST server. will it make more sense to pass it down toVendedCredentialsProvider
instead of expectingLoadTableResponse.config()
to include that property? This is just a proposal, I'm still trying to figure out how iceberg should interact with a REST server,Apache Polaris
in our case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is already being done today in
iceberg/aws/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/aws/AwsClientProperties.java
Lines 203 to 206 in 7d0395d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right. but when
loadTable
is called, the token from the tableSession does not get included in the property that initiatestableFileIO
. This PR is proposing to include that token in the properties so theVendedCredentialsProvider
can use it to initiate the http client.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wolflex888 I'm not sure I'm following here. The oauth token that is potentially sub-scoped to the loaded table is passed to the Table FileIO instance in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/rest/RESTSessionCatalog.java#L973-L980