Skip to content

Feature/kbdev 1306 fix disease matching #67

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mathieulemieux
Copy link
Member

Use 'similarToExtended' queryType for Disease matching instead of get_term_tree().
Fallback to former matching method if 'similarToExtended' queryType is not implemented on a given GraphKB API.
In both cases a logger message display which matching method has been used.

@mathieulemieux mathieulemieux self-assigned this May 2, 2025
@mathieulemieux mathieulemieux changed the base branch from main to develop May 2, 2025 16:29
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.96%. Comparing base (595b2ef) to head (5ecc23e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #67      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    83.73%   83.96%   +0.22%     
===========================================
  Files           18       18              
  Lines         2380     2395      +15     
===========================================
+ Hits          1993     2011      +18     
+ Misses         387      384       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 83.96% <100.00%> (+0.22%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mathieulemieux mathieulemieux marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2025 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants