Skip to content

chore: Revert to upstream nifti-reader-js - #296

Draft
effigies wants to merge 4 commits into
bids-standard:mainfrom
effigies:chore/upstream-nifti
Draft

chore: Revert to upstream nifti-reader-js#296
effigies wants to merge 4 commits into
bids-standard:mainfrom
effigies:chore/upstream-nifti

Conversation

@effigies

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nellh I think your PRs all got merged? They do an annoying thing where they put compiled results in the source directory, so merging in master was a bit of a pain and I'm not sure I did it right.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.73%. Comparing base (2311270) to head (1de61a2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #296   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.73%   87.73%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        4843     4843           
  Branches      789      789           
=======================================
  Hits         4249     4249           
  Misses        502      502           
  Partials       92       92           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@effigies
effigies marked this pull request as draft November 21, 2025 18:24
@effigies
effigies force-pushed the chore/upstream-nifti branch from 4162fb3 to ac95150 Compare September 2, 2026 15:49
Poly-fill module and bump confetti, which started breaking for some reason.
@effigies
effigies force-pushed the chore/upstream-nifti branch from ac95150 to d22f17a Compare September 2, 2026 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant