Skip to content

Conversation

@ThomasWaldmann
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 3.55240% with 543 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 75.84%. Comparing base (9ae6da8) to head (661d2b6).
⚠️ Report is 30 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/borg/hlfuse.py 0.00% 520 Missing ⚠️
src/borg/archiver/mount_cmds.py 7.14% 12 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/borg/fuse_impl.py 64.28% 9 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9213      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.72%   75.84%   -2.88%     
==========================================
  Files          85       86       +1     
  Lines       14188    14741     +553     
  Branches     2102     2194      +92     
==========================================
+ Hits        11169    11180      +11     
- Misses       2347     2888     +541     
- Partials      672      673       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Updated mount_cmds_test.py to work with both llfuse/pyfuse3 and mfusepy
by checking for either implementation in skip conditions.

mfusepy: 2 test fails due to hardlink implementation differences
fuse2 was a bit misleading. it meant "our 2nd fuse implementation",
but could be misunderstood to refer to fuse v2.

hlfuse.py now means highlevel fuse, as opposed to the lowlevel fuse in fuse.py.
Also: on freebsd, run tox env py311-mfusepy
@ThomasWaldmann ThomasWaldmann force-pushed the mfusepy branch 2 times, most recently from 728f780 to 5c80155 Compare December 20, 2025 19:47
@ThomasWaldmann ThomasWaldmann merged commit 4a1d0eb into borgbackup:master Dec 23, 2025
16 of 18 checks passed
@ThomasWaldmann ThomasWaldmann deleted the mfusepy branch December 23, 2025 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant