feat: replace solana-program with pubkey/account-info/instruction crates

[sonicfromnewyoke]

Problem

renderers-rust and renderers-vixen-parser use bloated solana-sdk and solana-program crates

Solution

replace solana-sdk and solana-program by smaller creates which leads to faster compilation time and smaller bin sizes according to solana-sdk-crate-migration-guide

also solana-* crates were bumped to the ~v2.2

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: f6ee63f

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 4 packages

Name	Type
@codama/renderers-rust	Minor
@codama/renderers-vixen-parser	Minor
@codama/cli	Patch
@codama/renderers	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[fernandodeluret]

From the perspective of renderers-vixen-parser (and the use we do there of renderers-rust) this is LGTM! 🤝 ❤️

[lorisleiva]

Thanks, we’ve actually already got this done for solana-pubkey (#535) in a dedicated branch (renderers-rust/use-granular-crates) in the hope to tackle more granular crates as they get released. This is mainly so we can do a single breaking change for the Rust renderer for all these changes. Would you be able to submit multiple PRs for the other crates into this branch? Then we can publish the whole branch when it’s ready.

[sonicfromnewyoke]

Thanks, we’ve actually already got this done for solana-pubkey (#535) in a dedicated branch (renderers-rust/use-granular-crates) in the hope to tackle more granular crates as they get released. This is mainly so we can do a single breaking change for the Rust renderer for all these changes. Would you be able to submit multiple PRs for the other crates into this branch? Then we can publish the whole branch when it’s ready.

oh yeah, no problem. I didn't know about this branch. So, if i got you correctly there will be 1 dedicated MR for 1 solana-* create, right?

[lorisleiva]

Yeah that'd be great. That way it's easier to review and we can provide more digestible changelogs.

[lorisleiva]

Thank you for making progress on these smaller PRs! I'll close this since we're making progress in different PRs instead of this one.

See #641, #645.