Remove tree-sitter and associated build infrastructure

[Swatinem]

The static-analysis command previously depended on tree-sitter, which required building some C-based extensions coming from submodules.

Now that static-analysis is gone, we can also remove tree-sitter and all associated build complexity.

[codecov]

❌ 5 Tests Failed:

Tests completed	Failed	Passed	Skipped
3435	5	3430	5

View the top 3 failed test(s) by shortest run time

api.temp.calculator.test_calculator::test_divide

Stack Traces | 0.001s run time

def
                test_divide():
                > assert Calculator.divide(1, 2) == 0.5
                E assert 1.0 == 0.5
                E + where 1.0 = <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90>(1, 2)
                E + where <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90> = Calculator.divide
                .../temp/calculator/test_calculator.py:30: AssertionError

api.temp.calculator.test_calculator::test_divide

Stack Traces | 0.001s run time

def
                test_divide():
                > assert Calculator.divide(1, 2) == 0.5
                E assert 1.0 == 0.5
                E + where 1.0 = <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90>(1, 2)
                E + where <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90> = Calculator.divide
                .../temp/calculator/test_calculator.py:30: AssertionError

api.temp.calculator.test_calculator::test_divide

Stack Traces | 0.001s run time

def
                test_divide():
                > assert Calculator.divide(1, 2) == 0.5
                E assert 1.0 == 0.5
                E + where 1.0 = <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90>(1, 2)
                E + where <function Calculator.divide at 0x104c9eb90> = Calculator.divide
                .../temp/calculator/test_calculator.py:30: AssertionError

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
_{📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.}

[github-actions]

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests were found.

📣 Thoughts on this report? Let Codecov know! | Powered by Codecov

[thomasrockhu-codecov]

Generally looks good, can you update the build_assets.yml to run on

on:
  push:
    - swatinem/rm-treesitter

to see if this workflow will run, can delete after once the artifacts are created and test one out locally

[thomasrockhu-codecov]

I know we used 20.04 specifically for some reason, I probably would change this to 22.04 instead

[thomasrockhu-codecov]

Pending the change to 22.04

[webknjaz]

@Swatinem you could've just deleted this file for good as a part of this patch. There's no use for it once you're done with the C-extensions.

[webknjaz]

@Swatinem there's also leftover jobs @ https://github.com/codecov/codecov-cli/blob/main/.github/workflows/build_for_pypi.yml