Skip to content

Make it even clearer that the empty RDB file needs to be in binary #302

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

andy1li
Copy link
Member

@andy1li andy1li commented Apr 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified that RDB file contents must be sent as binary data during replication full resynchronization.
    • Updated example formats and explanatory notes to emphasize binary transmission requirements.

@andy1li andy1li requested a review from rohitpaulk April 28, 2025 14:27
@andy1li andy1li self-assigned this Apr 28, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation for the replication full resynchronization process was updated to clarify that the RDB file must be transmitted as binary data. The example format was revised to explicitly indicate binary content, and explanatory notes were adjusted to reinforce that the transmitted data should be decoded into binary before sending. The documentation also reiterates that this format is not a RESP bulk string due to the absence of a trailing carriage return and newline.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
course-definition.yml Updated documentation to specify that RDB file contents must be sent as binary data during replication, revising examples and explanatory notes accordingly.

Poem

A bunny with bytes in its clever mind,
Hops through docs, leaving clarity behind.
"Send it as binary!" the rabbit decrees,
No more confusion—just data with ease.
With every hop, the process is clear,
RDB in binary, let’s all give a cheer! 🐇💾


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
course-definition.yml (1)

1379-1379: Suggest: Use consistent placeholder in example snippet
The example format shows $<length_of_file>\r\n<binary_contents_of_file>, which is clear. Consider wrapping this line in a fenced code block within the YAML to avoid interpolation issues and improve readability.

Example diff:

 description_markdown: |
   …
-  `$<length_of_file>\r\n<binary_contents_of_file>`
+  ```text
+  $<length_of_file>\r\n<binary_contents_of_file>
+  ```
   (This is similar to how …
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d28be7 and 3e50b05.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • course-definition.yml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (15)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (zig)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (typescript)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (swift)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (scala)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (rust)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (ocaml)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (kotlin)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (java)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (haskell)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (go)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (csharp)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (crystal)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (cpp)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (clojure)
  • GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (c)

@andy1li andy1li merged commit f584fec into main Apr 29, 2025
27 of 32 checks passed
@andy1li
Copy link
Member Author

andy1li commented Apr 29, 2025

Thanks @LittleAlex72 for highlighting the issue!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants