Skip to content

Clarify scope of the task in #hd5 Multi Replica Command Propagation #304

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 15, 2025

Conversation

andy1li
Copy link
Member

@andy1li andy1li commented May 13, 2025

Context:
https://backend.codecrafters.io/admin/course_stage_feedback_submissions/4b9b754d-ce28-423a-8a09-0c0b03c3b2fa/edit

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified the description of the "Multi Replica Command Propagation" stage in the replication extension to specify that the implementation applies specifically to the master side.

@andy1li andy1li requested a review from rohitpaulk May 13, 2025 21:44
@andy1li andy1li self-assigned this May 13, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The description for the "Multi Replica Command Propagation" stage in the replication extension was updated to clarify that the implementation changes are required only on the master side, with no changes needed on the replica side. No functional requirements or control flow were altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
course-definition.yml Updated the stage description to specify that only the master implementation requires modification; added a "Notes" section stating no changes are needed on the replica side.

Poem

A tweak to the docs, so clear and precise,
Masters send commands, replicas think twice.
No need for the replicas to change or to fret,
The master’s the star—let’s not forget!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd7dea9 and 70cc0ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • course-definition.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • course-definition.yml

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note added

@@ -1514,6 +1514,9 @@ stages:
```

It'll then assert that each replica received those commands, in order.

### Notes
- There is no need to change anything in the replica implementation for this stage.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"There is no need" is a bit unclear and vague - first question a person would ask is "why is there no need?"

Can't think of a clean neat sentence to improve off the top of my head - @andy1li do you want to come up with a few options here? Also worth looking at our other stage instructions to see if we already have something similar

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Options:

  • No changes are needed in the replica implementation for this stage. You’ll handle that in the upcoming stages.
  • For this stage, focus only on the master. Changes to the replica will be covered in the upcoming stages.
  • This stage doesn’t require any changes to the replica implementation. You’ll handle that soon.

Existing instructions:

https://app.codecrafters.io/courses/interpreter/stages/xc5:

In this stage, you'll add support for scanning other single-character tokens, namely ,, ., -, +, ; and *. / is not covered here, it's covered in later stages.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reverted to just adding "master" to the hook.

Copy link
Member

@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note added

@andy1li andy1li merged commit c5d133c into main May 15, 2025
32 checks passed
@andy1li
Copy link
Member Author

andy1li commented May 15, 2025

Thanks @rahmonov for highlighting the issue!

@rahmonov
Copy link

Awesome! Glad I could help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants