docs: upgrade theme to v8

[creativeprojects]

• Upgrade theme to https://github.com/McShelby/hugo-theme-relearn/releases/tag/8.0.1
• Upgrade Hugo to https://github.com/gohugoio/hugo/releases/tag/v0.150.1

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Bumps Hugo from 0.145.0 to 0.150.1 in CI workflows and Makefile, updates a docs note to Hugo shortcode syntax, adds commented config hints in docs/hugo.toml, advances the Relearn theme submodule, and revises a Go doc comment without changing code behaviour.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Hugo version update (CI and build) \.github/workflows/doc.yml, \.github/workflows/release-doc.yml, Makefile	Set Hugo version to 0.150.1 in CI “Setup Hugo” steps and Makefile target for $(GOBIN)/hugo. No other logic changes.
Docs content formatting docs/content/schedules/commands.md	Replaced [!NOTE] block with Hugo notice shortcode {{% notice note %}}…{{% /notice %}}; content unchanged.
Docs config comments docs/hugo.toml	Added commented examples for enabling Goldmark unsafe rendering under link sections; no functional change.
Theme submodule bump docs/themes/hugo-theme-relearn	Updated submodule commit from d375e4a… to e812df0….
Go comment update term/term.go	Clarified doc comment for OsStdoutTerminalSize; no code or signature changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description is entirely empty and provides no context or details related to the changeset, so it does not meet the requirement of being at least related to the changes.	Please add a descriptive summary that outlines the purpose and scope of the updates—such as the theme upgrade to v8, the Hugo version bump, and any documentation adjustments—to give reviewers clear context.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title succinctly conveys the primary purpose of the pull request—upgrading the documentation theme to version 8—using the conventional “docs:” prefix and clear wording that aligns with the branch name and submodule update.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch docs-relearn-v8

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a99c85 and 970906d.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)

• .github/workflows/doc.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/release-doc.yml (1 hunks)
• Makefile (1 hunks)
• docs/content/schedules/commands.md (1 hunks)
• docs/hugo.toml (1 hunks)
• docs/themes/hugo-theme-relearn (1 hunks)
• term/term.go (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)

• GitHub Check: build
• GitHub Check: Build and test (1.25, ubuntu-latest)
• GitHub Check: Build and test (1.25, windows-latest)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/doc.yml (1)

40-44: Hugo version bump looks sound.

The workflow now aligns with the rest of the PR’s upgrade path, and 0.150.1 remains supported by the peaceiris action. Nicely done.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 79.69%. Comparing base (0a99c85) to head (970906d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #565   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.69%   79.69%           
=======================================
  Files         137      137           
  Lines       13467    13467           
=======================================
  Hits        10732    10732           
  Misses       2310     2310           
  Partials      425      425           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	79.69% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud