Skip to content

Asyncronous notification for mf enforcement rules #1804

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SofiaSazonova
Copy link
Contributor

bugfixes

Feature or Bugfix

  • When MF enforcement rule is created, entity owners are notified asynchronously. MF enforcement rule is created and return immidiately
  • fix for delete_mf_enforcement_rule
  • small typos

Detail

Relates

Security

Please answer the questions below briefly where applicable, or write N/A. Based on
OWASP 10.

  • Does this PR introduce or modify any input fields or queries - this includes
    fetching data from storage outside the application (e.g. a database, an S3 bucket)?
    • Is the input sanitized?
    • What precautions are you taking before deserializing the data you consume?
    • Is injection prevented by parametrizing queries?
    • Have you ensured no eval or similar functions are used?
  • Does this PR introduce any functionality or component that requires authorization?
    • How have you ensured it respects the existing AuthN/AuthZ mechanisms?
    • Are you logging failed auth attempts?
  • Are you using or adding any cryptographic features?
    • Do you use a standard proven implementations?
    • Are the used keys controlled by the customer? Where are they stored?
  • Are you introducing any new policies/roles/users?
    • Have you used the least-privilege principle? How?

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@SofiaSazonova SofiaSazonova requested review from petrkalos and dlpzx April 7, 2025 16:50
@petrkalos petrkalos added this to v2.8.0 Apr 24, 2025
@petrkalos petrkalos moved this to Review in progress in v2.8.0 Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Review in progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant