Skip to content

Int32 repro original#581

Merged
jbsv merged 15 commits into
int32-reviewedfrom
int32-repro-original
Nov 24, 2025
Merged

Int32 repro original#581
jbsv merged 15 commits into
int32-reviewedfrom
int32-repro-original

Conversation

@ValeriodeSa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Could not start CI tests due to missing safe PR label. Please contact a DEDIS maintainer.

@jbsv jbsv added the safe PR label Aug 22, 2025
@pierluca
pierluca changed the base branch from int32-reviewed to master August 29, 2025 14:38
@thehoul thehoul mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2025
Comment thread share/dkg/pedersen/status.go Outdated
Comment thread share/vss/pedersen/vss_test.go Outdated
Comment thread share/vss/rabin/vss_test.go Outdated
Comment thread .golangci.bck.yml Outdated
@jbsv
jbsv marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 17:23
@jbsv
jbsv changed the base branch from master to int32-reviewed November 11, 2025 15:17
@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Nov 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@thehoul
thehoul force-pushed the int32-repro-original branch 2 times, most recently from a9173e5 to 537820e Compare November 12, 2025 14:58

@thehoul thehoul left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also reviewed the comment from Yolan on #579 that were relevant for this PR.

I will take some time to

  1. Make sure all int in the code have been switched to uint32. @ValeriodeSa how certain are you to have covered everything?
  2. Test the protobuf serialiazation/deserialiazation of uint32

Comment thread share/pvss/pvss_test.go
@thehoul
thehoul requested a review from jbsv November 18, 2025 12:16
@jbsv
jbsv force-pushed the int32-repro-original branch from 79dda03 to fa56084 Compare November 19, 2025 14:35
@thehoul
thehoul force-pushed the int32-repro-original branch from 7be5ef8 to 332e7a8 Compare November 19, 2025 15:06

@jbsv jbsv left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, although we should try to keep sonar happy.

@jbsv
jbsv force-pushed the int32-repro-original branch from 8e9bdc2 to fa56084 Compare November 24, 2025 08:33
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot
14.4% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 10%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@jbsv
jbsv merged commit c737e7f into int32-reviewed Nov 24, 2025
13 checks passed
@jbsv
jbsv deleted the int32-repro-original branch November 24, 2025 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants