[Doc] minor update to node classification tutorial #7840
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Muhammed Fatih BALIN <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Xinyu Yao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <[email protected]>
if not both data and model are sent to gpu the code raises error ``` bash RuntimeError: Expected all tensors to be on the same device, but found at least two devices, cuda:0 and cpu! when resuming training ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
minor change in tutorial comment for enabling gpu training, changing the code without sending the model to gpu raises error
Checklist
Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR.
The PR title starts with [$CATEGORY] (such as [NN], [Model], [Doc], [Feature]])
The PR is complete and small, read the Google eng practice (CL equals to PR) to understand more about small PR. In DGL, we consider PRs with less than 200 lines of core code change are small (example, test and documentation could be exempted).
Code is well-documented
To the best of my knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change
Related issue is referred in this PR
Changes