Skip to content

Conversation

@erogers-dstl
Copy link
Contributor

This is an alternative approach to caching (for discussion only) to Steve's recently implemented one. This has the (possible?) advantage of being able to register dependent properties that are Base object, and clear a cache if any properties of the dependent property are modified. See one of the tests for an example of this behaviour.

@erogers-dstl erogers-dstl requested a review from a team as a code owner September 14, 2022 12:26
@erogers-dstl erogers-dstl requested review from hpritchett-dstl and removed request for a team September 14, 2022 12:26
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 14, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 94.58% // Head: 94.62% // Increases project coverage by +0.04% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (1d33c3a) compared to base (ed7ffb0).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #716      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.58%   94.62%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         172      172              
  Lines        8841     8914      +73     
  Branches     1721     1731      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         8362     8435      +73     
  Misses        346      346              
  Partials      133      133              
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 69.73% <21.91%> (-0.40%) ⬇️
unittests 90.77% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
stonesoup/base.py 96.47% <100.00%> (+1.21%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants