-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
[PoC] Add LogAsFilestream feature flag #143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this need to be here? Can't it flow in as part of the input/integration configuration? The reason FQDN is here is we wanted it supported for all agent components in the same policy, it is not input specific.
Additionally, because we include
sourcehere you could prototype or possibly even implement this by just parsing the new flag out ofsourcewhich would transport it without this modification. It's the raw unmodified config from the features section of the agent policy.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At the moment this flag is still in a PoC state, the current implementation forces all Log input to run as Filestream regardless of what has been set in the input configuration.
It is very useful for testing, allowing us to set it in the policy level without having to touch any integration. This covers both manual testing or actually deploying somewhere a snapshot version of the Elastic Agent/Beats and trying this out without having to update any integration.
I'll try that later. Thanks!
Honestly, I wasn't expecting anyone to review a draft PR 😅. I created the PR mostly to easily link all the changes I'm making.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added
[PoC]to the title to make it clear it's not a final implementation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just wanted to make sure you weren't putting effort into something that isn't actually needed. I'm not taking this PR as the final implementation.
You don't need to touch the integration if it already accepted custom configuration where you can type whatever you want into the YAML box and have it be appended to the integration configuration.
I see value in having a global toggle at the policy level for this as a convenience but it does seem like something that is much easier to experiment with the integration level. That is probably also how we would want to roll it out, because we can change defaults in integrations at any time but changes to defaults for policy level settings require a stack release.