Skip to content

docs(op-node): document syncmode.req-resp and fix p2p.sync.req-resp wording#20009

Draft
donoso-eth wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
docs/syncmode-req-resp
Draft

docs(op-node): document syncmode.req-resp and fix p2p.sync.req-resp wording#20009
donoso-eth wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
docs/syncmode-req-resp

Conversation

@donoso-eth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@donoso-eth donoso-eth commented Apr 10, 2026

Summary

  • Add a new ### syncmode.req-resp entry to the op-node config reference. The flag was previously undocumented, leaving operators with no way to discover it or its default from --help or the docs.
  • Rewrite the ### p2p.sync.req-resp description, which previously called it an "alternative sync method, on both server and client side" — wording that is both vague (alternative to what?) and misleading in light of the Req/Res CL sync deprecation, since the client and server paths are being deprecated on different timelines.
  • Both entries include a compact Warning block pointing to the Req/Res CL sync deprecation notice.

Dependencies

Test plan

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

…ording

Adds a config reference entry for --syncmode.req-resp and flags it as
deprecated in favor of execution-layer syncing. Rewrites the
--p2p.sync.req-resp description to accurately describe the server and
client roles and notes the upcoming deprecation of both paths. Relates
to PR #19998 (Req/Res CL sync deprecation notice).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@mintlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mintlify bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Optimism-Docs 🟢 Ready View Preview Apr 10, 2026, 9:19 AM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant