feat(tests) EIP-2929: Gas cost increase tests

[reedsa]

🗒️ Description

Converted tests for gas cost increases from EIP-2929.

🔗 Related Issues

#972 (stPreCompiledContracts / stPreCompiledContracts2)

✅ Checklist

• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes.
• All: Considered squashing commits to improve commit history.
• All: Added an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• Tests: All converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests have been added to converted-ethereum-tests.txt.
• Tests: A PR with removal of converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests have been opened.
• Tests: Included the type and version of evm t8n tool used to locally execute test cases: e.g., ref with commit hash or geth 1.13.1-stable-3f40e65.
• Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.

[winsvega]

so looks like the parametrization in all this tests really is

adress, value, output size.

it can be one test with that many parametrizations

for each addesss
for each value
for each output size

and so on. if the test body does not change.

[reedsa]

Had issues with parametrizing with expected values that depend on specific inputs. Ended up changing these to parametrize the inputs and created separate tests for the permutations of the expected output.

I noticed the expected gas cost for many cases are different from the original tests. I'm looking at those closely to figure out the actual values to use, there may be additional changes to the contract based on certain scenarios. I'll check dr to figure out the differences there.

Does the current approach seem reasonable? If so, I plan to add the remaining test cases that use CALLCODE, DELEGATECALL, etc.