Skip to content

Conversation

@rickstaa
Copy link
Contributor

@rickstaa rickstaa commented Feb 22, 2022

This pull request ensures the gravity contribution is accounted for in the joint collision checking. This needs to be done since it is not stored in joint->command variable. Please have a look at #363 for more information.

@rickstaa rickstaa force-pushed the fix_gazebo_joint_collision_check_bug branch from a07f15e to 78ab3e7 Compare February 22, 2022 10:49
@rickstaa rickstaa force-pushed the fix_gazebo_joint_collision_check_bug branch 2 times, most recently from 2607036 to c3bb941 Compare March 18, 2022 10:39
@rickstaa rickstaa force-pushed the fix_gazebo_joint_collision_check_bug branch from c3bb941 to ee0ad7d Compare September 1, 2023 13:03
@rickstaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

rickstaa commented Sep 1, 2023

@Maverobot, @gollth, since I still think this pull request fixes a critical bug, I just rebased it on the develop branch and ensured no CI errors were present. Would it be possible to merge this so I can use the upstream instead of my fork?

Your assistance in getting this pull request merged would be significantly appreciated 🙏🏻.

Thanks a lot in advance!

Copy link
Contributor

@gollth gollth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for finding this. Makes sense to me!

This commit makes sure the gravity contribution is accounted for in the
joint collision checking. This needs to be done since it is not stored
in `joint->command` variable.
@rickstaa rickstaa force-pushed the fix_gazebo_joint_collision_check_bug branch from ee0ad7d to e0ffbf3 Compare March 23, 2024 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants