Skip to content

Comments

feat: govdao v3 better rendering#4164

Closed
leohhhn wants to merge 6 commits intognolang:masterfrom
leohhhn:govdao3-rendering
Closed

feat: govdao v3 better rendering#4164
leohhhn wants to merge 6 commits intognolang:masterfrom
leohhhn:govdao3-rendering

Conversation

@leohhhn
Copy link
Contributor

@leohhhn leohhhn commented Apr 15, 2025

Description

Adds better rendering to GovDAO v3. Includes nicer proposal listing, proposal page, and txlinks to vote on proposals.
Screenshot 2025-04-15 at 21 32 08
Screenshot 2025-04-15 at 21 32 18

history repeats.... #3096

@leohhhn leohhhn requested a review from ajnavarro April 15, 2025 19:30
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🧾 package/realm Tag used for new Realms or Packages. label Apr 15, 2025
@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 added the review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review label Apr 15, 2025
@Gno2D2
Copy link
Collaborator

Gno2D2 commented Apr 15, 2025

🛠 PR Checks Summary

🔴 Must not contain the "don't merge" label

Manual Checks (for Reviewers):
  • IGNORE the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)
Read More

🤖 This bot helps streamline PR reviews by verifying automated checks and providing guidance for contributors and reviewers.

✅ Automated Checks (for Contributors):

🟢 Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)
🔴 Must not contain the "don't merge" label
🟢 Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

☑️ Contributor Actions:
  1. Fix any issues flagged by automated checks.
  2. Follow the Contributor Checklist to ensure your PR is ready for review.
    • Add new tests, or document why they are unnecessary.
    • Provide clear examples/screenshots, if necessary.
    • Update documentation, if required.
    • Ensure no breaking changes, or include BREAKING CHANGE notes.
    • Link related issues/PRs, where applicable.
☑️ Reviewer Actions:
  1. Complete manual checks for the PR, including the guidelines and additional checks if applicable.
📚 Resources:
Debug
Automated Checks
Maintainers must be able to edit this pull request (more info)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 The pull request was created from a fork (head branch repo: leohhhn/gno)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 Maintainer can modify this pull request

Must not contain the "don't merge" label

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 A label matches this pattern: don't merge (label: don't merge)

Then

🔴 Requirement not satisfied
└── 🔴 On no pull request

Pending initial approval by a review team member, or review from tech-staff

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 And
    ├── 🟢 The base branch matches this pattern: ^master$
    └── 🟢 Not (🔴 Pull request author is a member of the team: tech-staff)

Then

🟢 Requirement satisfied
└── 🟢 If
    ├── 🟢 Condition
    │   └── 🟢 Or
    │       ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the organization reviewed the pull request (with state "APPROVED")
    │       ├── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request
    │       └── 🟢 This pull request is a draft
    └── 🟢 Then
        └── 🟢 And
            ├── 🟢 Not (🔴 This label is applied to pull request: review/triage-pending)
            └── 🟢 At least 1 user(s) of the team tech-staff reviewed pull request

Manual Checks
**IGNORE** the bot requirements for this PR (force green CI check)

If

🟢 Condition met
└── 🟢 On every pull request

Can be checked by

  • Any user with comment edit permission

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

urequire.Equal(t, true, contains(dao.Render(""), "NO PERCENT: 68.42105263157895%"))
}

func TestProposalPagination(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to test this, its tested in p/demo/avl/pager already

}
println(dao.Render(""))

func contains(s, substr string) bool {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also strings.Contains exists

@Kouteki Kouteki moved this from Triage to In Review in 🧙‍♂️Gno.land development Apr 16, 2025
Comment on lines -27 to -29
r.HandleFunc("/", func(rw *mux.ResponseWriter, req *mux.Request) {
rw.Write(ren.renderActiveProposals(req.RawPath, d))
})
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this checks for pkgpath:/ so kind of useless as well

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 📦 ⛰️ gno.land Issues or PRs gno.land package related label Apr 16, 2025
out += ufmt.Sprintf("[Detailed voting list](%v:%v/votes)", ren.relativeRealmPath, sPid)
out += "\n\n---\n\n"

out += renderActionBar(sPid)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this not missing the eligible tiers?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's given out by out += ps.String()

@Gno2D2 Gno2D2 removed the review/triage-pending PRs opened by external contributors that are waiting for the 1st review label Apr 16, 2025
@leohhhn leohhhn added the don't merge Please don't merge this functionality temporarily label Apr 16, 2025
@leohhhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

leohhhn commented Apr 16, 2025

Let's wait until we're good with the current impl on the chain and then we can easily upgrade to this.

@leohhhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

leohhhn commented May 27, 2025

Would still love to merge this; I'll try to solve the conflicts

@thehowl thehowl marked this pull request as draft May 28, 2025 09:07
@Kouteki Kouteki moved this from In Review to Todo in 🧙‍♂️Gno.land development Jun 2, 2025
@leohhhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

leohhhn commented Jun 26, 2025

Updates to the prop reason/name in r/gnoland/users/v1 can be discarded, or taken from this PR: #4415

ie, the "Realm Name Version: Proposal" format is nice.

@leohhhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

leohhhn commented Jul 2, 2025

Superseded by #4453, thanks @MikaelVallenet. closing.

@leohhhn leohhhn closed this Jul 2, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in 💪 Bounties & Worx Jul 2, 2025
leohhhn added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
based on leon PR #4164
what i did its just merge master & fixing tests & introduce crossing

---------

Co-authored-by: leohhhn <hudakleon@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon <33522493+leohhhn@users.noreply.github.com>
stefann-01 pushed a commit to stefann-01/gno that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2025
based on leon PR gnolang#4164
what i did its just merge master & fixing tests & introduce crossing

---------

Co-authored-by: leohhhn <hudakleon@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leon <33522493+leohhhn@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

don't merge Please don't merge this functionality temporarily 📦 ⛰️ gno.land Issues or PRs gno.land package related 🧾 package/realm Tag used for new Realms or Packages.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants