Skip to content

Conversation

@MikeSchulze
Copy link
Collaborator

@MikeSchulze MikeSchulze commented Jan 9, 2026

Why

The current API does not allow the use of variadic argument style and needs to define expected arguments as an array.

What

  • Adding support of variadic argument support to assert_signal
  • Allow type Signal and String for signal name
  • Update documentation v6.1 for assert_signal

# Why
The current API does not allow the use of variadic argument style and needs to define expected arguments as an array.

# What
- Adding support of variadic argument support to assert_signal
- Update documentaion v6.1 for assert_signal
@MikeSchulze MikeSchulze self-assigned this Jan 9, 2026
@MikeSchulze MikeSchulze merged commit 928ed0e into master Jan 9, 2026
13 checks passed
@MikeSchulze MikeSchulze deleted the GD-1051 branch January 9, 2026 16:58
@MikeSchulze MikeSchulze changed the title GD-1051: Add variadic argument support to assert_signal GD-1051: Add variadic argument support to assert_signal and support String and Signal reference for signal_name argument Jan 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GD-1051: Add variadic argument support to assert_signal and support Signal reference for signal_name

2 participants