Reword text_editor/completion/add_type_hints's description
#107601
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mickeon
commented
Jun 16, 2025
| - Accepting a suggestion from code autocompletion; | ||
| - Creating a new script from a template; | ||
| - Connecting signals from the Node dock; | ||
| - Creating variables prefixed with [annotation @GDScript.@onready], by dropping nodes from the Scene dock into the script editor while holding [kbd]Ctrl[/kbd]. |
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note that capitalizing the "Script editor" is extremely inconsistent, for some reason.
Mickeon
force-pushed
the
documentation-add_type_hints-overhaul
branch
from
f5e18c9 to
a8e9d8e
Compare
Contributor
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What the title says. The existing description is messy, non-exhaustive, and puts an awkward amount of emphasis on
onreadyvariables.This is separate from #107536 as it may require more scrutiny