-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
🐛 bug: Guard Binds decoder sync.Pool #3969
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughIntroduces concurrency-safe per-tag decoder pools guarded by a package-level mutex and accessed via a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @gaby, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a concurrency bug within the global decoder pool registry by implementing robust synchronization mechanisms. It introduces a read-write mutex to manage concurrent access to the decoder map, ensuring that both read and write operations are thread-safe. A new helper function streamlines safe decoder retrieval, and existing functions for pool initialization and configuration are updated to leverage these new locking primitives. The changes are thoroughly validated with dedicated concurrency tests to guarantee stability in multi-threaded environments. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses a potential race condition by introducing an RWMutex to protect the global decoder pool registry. The changes are well-structured, with helper functions for synchronized access and a new concurrency test to validate the fix. My review includes two main points: one suggestion to improve the robustness of the new getDecoderPool function, and a critical fix for the new concurrency test which uses a non-standard, experimental Go feature that will cause build failures for most contributors.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3969 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.67% 91.59% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 119 119
Lines 10177 10207 +30
==========================================
+ Hits 9330 9349 +19
- Misses 536 544 +8
- Partials 311 314 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR adds concurrency protection to the global decoder pool registry to prevent race conditions when SetParserDecoder is called concurrently with parser operations.
Key changes:
- Introduced an
RWMutexto protect concurrent access todecoderPoolMap - Added a
getDecoderPoolhelper function to safely retrieve decoder pools - Updated parsing logic to use the synchronized helper instead of direct map access
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
binder/mapping.go |
Added decoderPoolMu RWMutex and getDecoderPool helper for thread-safe pool access; protected SetParserDecoder and init() with write locks; updated parseToStruct to use synchronized pool retrieval |
binder/mapping_test.go |
Added concurrency test that exercises concurrent SetParserDecoder calls alongside parsing operations; updated existing pool test to use new getDecoderPool helper |
Summary