Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Dec 24, 2025

Description

This PR addresses feedback on #3969 regarding the use of sync.WaitGroup.Go() in the test suite. A bot reviewer incorrectly flagged this as a compilation error, but the method is valid in Go 1.25.0 (the project's required version).

Changes introduced

  • No code changes required - the implementation is correct
  • Confirmed sync.WaitGroup.Go() is available since Go 1.25
  • Project uses Go 1.25.0 per go.mod

The existing test implementation using wg.Go() is correct and leverages the new concurrency helper introduced in Go 1.25:

var wg sync.WaitGroup
runWorker := func(fn func() error) {
    wg.Go(func() {  // Valid in Go 1.25+
        // worker implementation
    })
}

Type of change

  • Code consistency (non-breaking change which improves code reliability and robustness)

Checklist

  • Conducted a self-review of the code and provided comments for complex or critical parts.
  • Ensured that new and existing unit tests pass locally with the changes.

Commit formatting

Please use emojis in commit messages for an easy way to identify the purpose or intention of a commit. Check out the emoji cheatsheet here: CONTRIBUTING.md


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] WIP address feedback on guarding Binds decoder pool implementation Address feedback on sync.WaitGroup.Go usage in Go 1.25 Dec 24, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from gaby December 24, 2025 23:59
@gaby gaby closed this Dec 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants