Skip to content

Mark dynamic-devices as exempt in Renault IQS #143450

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

epenet
Copy link
Contributor

@epenet epenet commented Apr 22, 2025

Proposed change

SSIA

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to developer documentation pull request:
  • Link to frontend pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@epenet epenet force-pushed the epenet-20250422-1449 branch from fc02006 to 1b2c1f2 Compare April 28, 2025 05:43
Comment on lines 50 to 52
dynamic-devices:
status: exempt
comment: Adding/removing a vehicle is a rare occurrence
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't seem useful to trigger a lookup every x minutes for new vehicles - we'd be using up valuable hits and renault is already rate-limited per account.

It's more likely that if someone adds a new car they will just reload the integration

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See also: #142964

Comment on lines +53 to +54
Adding/removing a vehicle is a rare occurrence, and we don't want to
waste valuable hits on Renault API, which is rate-limited
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like odd reasoning to me: A rare occurrence + worrying about rate-limiting.

If I might suggest an alternative, could you trigger a config entry reload if the change is detected?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no way to know without making a specific API "list vehicles" request

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@frenck are you suggesting that I should make an API call at regular interval to see if there are new vehicles?
If we are making a "list vehicles" call every few minutes we would need to reduce the interval for more important data calls.

I guess we could make a call every 24h, but seems a lot of work for very little benefit.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot marked this pull request as draft April 29, 2025 17:27
@home-assistant
Copy link

Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍

Learn more about our pull request process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants