CI: Use public ARM64 Github actions runners for ARM64 builds.

[Fijxu]

Currently, Invidious uses QEMU to build it's ARM64 Invidious image, which is slow (since we are basically using a virtual machine).

This helps with the speed of building ARM64 binaries for Invidious on each release/commit by a lot.

More information about the public ARM64 runners here: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/148648

---

Take a look at: https://github.com/Fijxu/invidious/actions/runs/15037532092 and https://github.com/Fijxu/invidious/actions/runs/15037532093

Testing OCI images at https://git.nadeko.net/Fijxu/-/packages/container/invidious_do_not_pull/master-arm64 and https://git.nadeko.net/Fijxu/-/packages/container/invidious_do_not_pull/master

[Fijxu]

If possible, test the ARM64 OCI Image on a real ARM64 machine. I don't have access to one (well, my phone may work) and I would like to know if it works fine just as the QEMU built one.

[Fijxu]

docker_compose_file: "docker-compose.yml" doesn't need to be specified, but makes it clearer to understand the job.

[syeopite]

Could you add a name attribute to the CI docker test build jobs?

This is a bit hard to understand. Maybe something like Test ${{platform}} docker build

[syeopite]

Perfect. Looks good to me!

[Fijxu]

It still bothers me a little to have two docker-compose files, one for AMD64 and ARM64. For sure we can just use docker buildx build -t invidious_docker_build_image instead of docker compose -f composefile.yml build and replace

invidious/docker-compose.yml

Lines 11 to 13 in 03f89be

	build:
	context: .
	dockerfile: docker/Dockerfile

To:

    image: invidious_docker_build_image

But I'm not sure :/, what do you think @syeopite

[syeopite]

Considering there is only a single line difference between the two compose files I think the simplest solution is to literally just sed dockerfile: docker/Dockerfile to dockerfile: docker/Dockerfile.arm64 and then add this step:

- name: Use ARM64 Dockerfile if ARM64
  if: ${{name}} == "ARM64"
  run: sed -i 's/Dockerfile/Dockerfile.arm64/' docker-compose.yml

[Fijxu]

Oh right... Dumb me.

[unixfox]

Would be interesting to merge both amd64 and arm64 into a single docker image tag. That's what @inetol did here at SearXNG with two separate Dockerfile: searxng/searxng#4764

Maybe he can explain to us how to do :)?

[Fijxu]

Would be interesting to merge both amd64 and arm64 into a single docker image tag. That's what @inetol did here at SearXNG with two separate Dockerfile: searxng/searxng#4764

Maybe he can explain to us how to do :)?

Oh that should be easy (at least from what I know). But I would prefer to do that in another PR