Skip to content

[JENKINS-75320] use the url for linking#10308

Merged
krisstern merged 13 commits intojenkinsci:masterfrom
scherler:JENKINS-75320
Apr 4, 2025
Merged

[JENKINS-75320] use the url for linking#10308
krisstern merged 13 commits intojenkinsci:masterfrom
scherler:JENKINS-75320

Conversation

@scherler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@scherler scherler commented Feb 21, 2025

See JENKINS-75320. when searching https://ci.jenkins.io//search/?q=junit the linking is wrong, adopt the new URL instead

Testing done

to test you need to create first a folder and then create a job (e.g. named 1) in the folder. then you need to request http://localhost:8080/search/?q=1 without the fix the link will point to http://localhost:8080/search/?q=folder+%C2%BB+1

Proposed changelog entries

  • Fix search results URLs when using the old search implementation

Proposed changelog category

/label bug

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

  • The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
  • The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
  • There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
  • New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
  • New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
  • New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
  • For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
  • For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.

Desired reviewers

@mention @janfaracik @timja @daniel-beck @basil

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

  • There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
  • Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
  • Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
  • Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
  • If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
  • If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Scherler <scherler@gmail.com>
@scherler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label bug

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the bug For changelog: Minor bug. Will be listed after features label Feb 21, 2025
@janfaracik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Tried it locally with a pipeline and it doesn't have /jenkins/ prefixed so its resulting in a 404.

image

@timja
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

timja commented Feb 22, 2025

Since you've labelled it as a bug can you please add a changelog entry

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Scherler <scherler@gmail.com>
@scherler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@timja added an entry @janfaracik good catch, forgot about the possible rootUrl, cheers

@scherler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@janfaracik @timja @daniel-beck @basil could you have a look?

@krisstern krisstern requested review from janfaracik and timja March 25, 2025 14:48
@timja
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

timja commented Mar 25, 2025

/label ready-for-merge


This PR is now ready for merge, after the upcoming security release we will merge it if there's no negative feedback.

Thanks!

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label Mar 25, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@A1exKH A1exKH left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@krisstern krisstern merged commit c7583cc into jenkinsci:master Apr 4, 2025
17 checks passed
<j:forEach var="i" items="${items}">
<li id="item_${i.path}">
<a href="?q=${h.urlEncode(i.path)}">${i.path}</a>
<a href="${rootURL}/${i.url}">${i.path}</a>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When the rootURL is empty this leads to a url that starts with a double slash. This results in a url like https://design-library (see https://weekly.ci.jenkins.io/search/?q=g)
So when i.url starts with a slash it must be removed first. Not sure but it seems the url is always absolute with respect to the root url so just removing the slash in here might be enough.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug For changelog: Minor bug. Will be listed after features ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants