Docs: Organize community_tools.md into sections of tool types

[JudoJJ]

This organizes the list into tool types a bit since the list is a bit long at this point, and also adds the new Judo tool. Feel free to suggest any ordering/organization changes, this was just my first intuition of the tool grouping.

[martinvonz]

this was just my first intuition of the tool grouping.

What is it based on? I thought it was alphabetical at first but at least GG and Selvejj are out of order.

[bryceberger]

Should probably be two commits, one organizing and one adding the tool

[zx8]

I'm raising this concern respectfully, and apologize for not having a HN account to respond directly to Martin's comment here.

I have some reservations about listing JudoJJ in the official documentation at this early stage:

• The project is closed source
• The HN account promoting it was created 19 hours ago
• This PR was submitted 20 hours ago
• The JudoJJ GitHub account was created 2 weeks ago
• The author is proposing to position the project before all other tools in the docs, despite having no established track record or known user base

Given that jj is likely installed on many developers' machines (including senior engineers at various big organizations) I think we should be cautious about promoting third-party integrations in the official docs, especially given recent supply chain security incidents.

[PhilipMetzger]

As I've said on the Discord, at this point it probably is worth it to introduce tool categories.

[github-actions]

The following commits do not follow our format for subject lines:

• ad10c02: Update community_tools.md

Commits should have a subject line following the format <topic>: <description>. Please review the commit guidelines for more information.

[JudoJJ]

I've made the following changes:

• Removed Judo in this PR to be separated into its own PR (if the above comment is a concern, that can be brought into that PR)
• Made each section alphabetical
• Noted the ordering is alphabetical so it isn't insinuated some other ordering is taking place

All commits are now correctly formatted. Thank you for your contribution!

[PhilipMetzger]

minor stuff, I also don't think you should move your addition to a separate PR so removing your addition in the second commit is unnecessary to me

[PhilipMetzger]

nit: I don't think adding this to the title helps, since you know it when you see it

[JudoJJ]

Addressed the comments and re-added the tool

[PhilipMetzger]

see https://jj-vcs.github.io/jj/prerelease/contributing/#code-reviews for more info on how the project does code review.

[JudoJJ]

Thanks, let me know if I put the commits in the proper format

[martinvonz]

I'm raising this concern respectfully, and apologize for not having a HN account to respond directly to Martin's comment here.

I would not dare install it myself (sorry, nothing against you specifically, @JudoJJ) but it sounds like many people worry less than I do. Should we just add a disclaimer saying that we don't take responsibility for these tools?

[PhilipMetzger]

Should we just add a disclaimer saying that we don't take responsibility for these tools?

This is a community page, we neither endorse or dismiss certain tools by having them here. But we need to say that at some point somewhere.