perf: Allow admins to configure available MFA services for user auth #5284
Conversation
| 'SECURITY_MFA_ENABLED_BACKENDS', | ||
| 'SECURITY_MFA_AUTH_ENABLED_FOR_THIRD_PARTY', | ||
| 'SECURITY_MFA_VERIFY_TTL', | ||
| 'OTP_ISSUER_NAME', 'OTP_VALID_WINDOW' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The given code snippet appears to be an example of how to set up security features such as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for users. The commented out lines show different MFA options that could be considered based on user needs.
It's important to note the following:
- There isn't a detailed explanation provided within this code indicating its intended function or what it aims to achieve exactly. However, from context clues such as "Multi-Factor Authentication" and "Security MFA", one might guess it has something to do with setting additional authentication steps beyond simple password login.
- It also includes two more sections,
EMAIL&THIRDPARTY. They seem like placeholders, likely because the project is incomplete.
To improve further:
-
Consider adding a short description at the top explaining why these multi-factor options are being used / proposed. This clarifies their utility in making the document clearer.
-
For future use cases: Add placeholder comments or documentation inside those sections, giving examples and justifications for each option so we can understand what’s happening behind-the-scenes easily without reading through extensive code blocks.
By including brief descriptions here, you not only make the doc easier to read but ensure the purpose and intent of all parts are clear, encouraging better collaboration across development teams who may have multiple developers contributing concurrently, leading to cleaner, more understandable shared knowledge.
Since the question asks for differences, no direct comparisons were made between the original version and updated versions – hence there aren't any specific technical changes identified.
|
perf: Allow admins to configure available MFA services for user auth