-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
[ValueTracking] Handle not cond to assume. #127140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am ok with the IR diff. But I am a bit confused by this line. Do we really need to specially handle
assume(not(cond))
?That is, we should also match trunc here if we want to remove
!IsAssume &&
from the following code:llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
Line 10346 in 70b95ca
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the
!IsAssume &&
for the trunc check is only to avoid to add the same value twice to theAssumptionCache
as it is added by thellvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
Lines 10229 to 10232 in 70b95ca
via
llvm-project/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
Lines 10261 to 10262 in 70b95ca
This was the only way that I was able to think of how to solve supporting not in assumes.