-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
[lldb] Fix SBTarget::ReadInstruction with flavor #136034
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
da-viper
wants to merge
2
commits into
llvm:release/20.x
Choose a base branch
from
da-viper:cherry-pick-read-instr
base: release/20.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+67
−3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When you call the `SBTarget::ReadInstructions` with flavor from lldb crashes. This is because the wrong order of the `DisassemblyBytes` constructor this fixes that --------- Signed-off-by: Ebuka Ezike <[email protected]>
Original in llvm#134626 was written as if it was "this or this" but it's "this and this". So the test ran on AArch64 Linux, because Linux is not Windows. Split out the Windows check to fix that.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: Ebuka Ezike (da-viper) ChangesBackported #134626 to 20.X Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/136034.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/source/API/SBTarget.cpp b/lldb/source/API/SBTarget.cpp
index 2a33161bc21ed..665b903aff79d 100644
--- a/lldb/source/API/SBTarget.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/API/SBTarget.cpp
@@ -2020,9 +2020,9 @@ lldb::SBInstructionList SBTarget::ReadInstructions(lldb::SBAddress base_addr,
error, force_live_memory, &load_addr);
const bool data_from_file = load_addr == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
sb_instructions.SetDisassembler(Disassembler::DisassembleBytes(
- target_sp->GetArchitecture(), nullptr, target_sp->GetDisassemblyCPU(),
- target_sp->GetDisassemblyFeatures(), flavor_string, *addr_ptr,
- data.GetBytes(), bytes_read, count, data_from_file));
+ target_sp->GetArchitecture(), nullptr, flavor_string,
+ target_sp->GetDisassemblyCPU(), target_sp->GetDisassemblyFeatures(),
+ *addr_ptr, data.GetBytes(), bytes_read, count, data_from_file));
}
}
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/Makefile b/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..10495940055b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+C_SOURCES := main.c
+
+include Makefile.rules
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/TestTargetReadInstructionsFlavor.py b/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/TestTargetReadInstructionsFlavor.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..12805985798de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/TestTargetReadInstructionsFlavor.py
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+"""
+Test SBTarget Read Instruction.
+"""
+
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+
+
+class TargetReadInstructionsFlavor(TestBase):
+ @skipIfWindows
+ @skipIf(archs=no_match(["x86_64", "x86", "i386"]))
+ def test_read_instructions_with_flavor(self):
+ self.build()
+ executable = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
+
+ # create a target
+ target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(executable)
+ self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "target is not valid")
+
+ functions = target.FindFunctions("test_add")
+ self.assertEqual(len(functions), 1)
+ test_add = functions[0]
+
+ test_add_symbols = test_add.GetSymbol()
+ self.assertTrue(
+ test_add_symbols.IsValid(), "test_add function symbols is not valid"
+ )
+
+ expected_instructions = (("mov", "eax, edi"), ("add", "eax, esi"), ("ret", ""))
+ test_add_insts = test_add_symbols.GetInstructions(target, "intel")
+ # clang adds an extra nop instruction but gcc does not. It makes more sense
+ # to check if it is at least 3
+ self.assertLessEqual(len(expected_instructions), len(test_add_insts))
+
+ # compares only the expected instructions
+ for expected_instr, instr in zip(expected_instructions, test_add_insts):
+ self.assertTrue(instr.IsValid(), "instruction is not valid")
+ expected_mnemonic, expected_op_str = expected_instr
+ self.assertEqual(instr.GetMnemonic(target), expected_mnemonic)
+ self.assertEqual(instr.GetOperands(target), expected_op_str)
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/main.c b/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/main.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..6022d63fb6ed7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lldb/test/API/python_api/target/read-instructions-flavor/main.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+
+// This simple program is to test the lldb Python API SBTarget ReadInstruction
+// function.
+//
+// When the target is create we get all the instructions using the intel
+// flavor and see if it is correct.
+
+int test_add(int a, int b);
+
+__asm__("test_add:\n"
+ " movl %edi, %eax\n"
+ " addl %esi, %eax\n"
+ " ret \n");
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+ int a = 10;
+ int b = 20;
+ int result = test_add(a, b);
+
+ return 0;
+}
\ No newline at end of file
|
JDevlieghere
approved these changes
Apr 19, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backported #134626 to 20.X