Catalist: Patch Exception Handling

[IanRFerguson]

What is this change?

Adds an exception for clarity in the CatalistMatch class if there is a failure to save the zipped file from the vendor's SFTP server. The current active exception is raising on zf.extractall(path=temp_dir), which tells us there's a problem with the file but not much else.

Breaking changes (if needed)

This is not a breaking change.

Considerations for discussion

N/A

How to test the changes (if needed)

• (How should a reviewer test this functionality.)

Labels

Please add exactly one of the following labels to this PR:

• breaking-change — This PR introduces a breaking change to the public API
• non-breaking-change — This PR does not break any existing functionality

The label check CI job will fail until one of these labels is applied.

[bmos]

In case it helps, here are rebuilt tests that actually use real files.
ian/patch/catalist-zip-operation...bmos:parsons:catalist-testing

[IanRFerguson]

In case it helps, here are rebuilt tests that actually use real files. ian/patch/catalist-zip-operation...bmos:parsons:catalist-testing

awesome, appreciate you Ramona! looks like everything besides the label check was passing (and I've since fixed that)

should I merge your branch into this one? or what's the standard operating procedure?

[bmos]

Merging the tests before merging this PR is probably better in theory because it shows that the tests pass with the existing code, but I'm fine with either and will be doing PR reviews with @shaunagm this afternoon if it's preferred to handle them separately.

[shaunagm]

approved and happy to merge once the tests pass (I assume they're not failing from this and the PR just needs to be updated)

[bmos]

They won't pass, the test suite needs to be changed.
There's a PR for @IanRFerguson to merge into this.
I'm going to post the PR against main since the test improvements are technically separate.

[shaunagm]

oh gotcha. i'll wait then!

[bmos]

@IanRFerguson The tests have been merged into main. If you update this branch from main I think they'll all pass.

[IanRFerguson]

hi @bmos - just want to make sure I'm tracking your changes correctly, should these checks be passing?

[bmos]

Hm, idk why it's not passing now.
I'll double check later this week.

[bmos]

This will fix your test failure, not sure what happened here.

Suggested change

	temp_file_zip = self.sftp.get_file(
	remote_path=remote_filepath, export_chunk_size=DEFAULT_EXPORT_CHUNK_SIZE
	)
	temp_file_zip = Path(
	self.sftp.get_file(
	remote_path=remote_filepath,
	export_chunk_size=DEFAULT_EXPORT_CHUNK_SIZE,
	)
	)

[bmos]

On an unrelated note, you might also want to use lazy formatting in your logger call, since f-strings are resolved even when the logger is not in debug mode.

Suggested change

	logger.debug(
	f"Download complete for job {id} (local size: {temp_file_zip.stat().st_size} bytes)."
	)
	logger.debug(
	"Download complete for job %s (local size: %s bytes).", id, temp_file_zip.stat().st_size
	)