Skip to content

Conversation

@masz-nordic
Copy link

MDK should not be included directly, but via nrfx.h

Copy link
Contributor

@weeTike weeTike left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You have to update these files from the dragoon repository. Otherwise your changes will be overwritten next time sdc is updated.

MDK should not be included directly, but via nrfx.h

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szymczyk <[email protected]>
MDK should not be included directly, but via nrfx.h

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szymczyk <[email protected]>
MDK should not be included directly, but via nrfx.h

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szymczyk <[email protected]>
MDK should not be included directly, but via nrfx.h

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szymczyk <[email protected]>
MDK should not be included directly, but via nrfx.h

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szymczyk <[email protected]>
MDK should not be included directly, but via nrfx.h

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szymczyk <[email protected]>
MDK should not be included directly, but via nrfx.h

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szymczyk <[email protected]>
Since `mpsh_hwres.h` should not use defines from nrfx,
the header has to be split.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Szymczyk <[email protected]>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@masz-nordic
Copy link
Author

@weeTike this is a WIP targeting non-main branch. Upon nrfx 4.0 release relevant changes will be added to dragoon repo.

@masz-nordic masz-nordic merged commit ff5b4a1 into nrfconnect:collab-nrfx-4.0 Oct 23, 2025
5 checks passed
#ifndef NRF_GZLL_H__
#define NRF_GZLL_H__

#include <stdbool.h>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

was it removed accidentally? bool is used in the header file so it makes it cleaner when it is included explicitly

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nrfx.h provides bool so I thought it's more concise. If the preference is to make it explicit, I can change that.

@piotrkoziar
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @masz-nordic ! I see this is already merged but I think it will be proposed to main branch eventually.

I just wanted to let you know that modyfying nrf-802154 files must be done from 802.15.4 radio-driver repository.

Doing it this way does not make sense - verification is not reliable and the files would be overwritten in a next deploy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants