Reworking the capabilities section

document/document.adoc

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-= GeoSPARQL 3d White Paper
+= GeoSPARQL 3D White Paper
 :doctype: white-paper
 :language: en
 :status: draft
@@ -14,12 +14,12 @@
 :issued-date: 2029-03-30
 :comment: ### Date on which the standard was published; mandatory
 :published-date: 2029-03-30
-:fullname: Editor One
+:fullname: Rolf Jonker
 :fullname_2: Editor Two
 :role: editor
 :imagesdir: figures
-:keywords: OGC, GeoSPARQL, 3D
-:submitting-organizations: Organization one; Organization two; Organization three
+:keywords: GeoSPARQL, 3D, Geospatial 3D Relations, Ontology, Vocabulary
+:submitting-organizations: Mainz University Of Applied Sciences; Kurrawong AI; Geonovum
 :mn-document-class: ogc
 :mn-output-extensions: html,pdf
 :pdf-uri: ./document.pdf
@@ -34,10 +34,10 @@
 
 include::sections/01-front_material.adoc[]
 
-include::sections/02-preamble.adoc[]
-
 :sectnums:
 
+include::sections/03-introduction.adoc[]
+
 include::sections/03a-motivation.adoc[]
 
 include::sections/03b-related-work.adoc[]

document/sections/01-front_material.adoc

@@ -1,23 +1,59 @@
+////
+== Keywords
+
+Keywords inserted here automatically by Metanorma
+////
+
+
+[abstract]
 == Abstract
 
-To come...
+The importance of the (semantic) representation of 3D geometries has increased in recent years. 
+Different databases of different data providers, such as provides for 3D city models, include 3D data in different formats and would benefit from a common data model which could semantically align its contents.
+In addition one wants to query information not only about the 3D geometries themselves but about their semantic context and their interconnectedness.
+To that end we showcase the shortcomings of the current GeoSPARQL 1.1 standard concerning native 3D querying and 3D representation and illustrate use cases and feature requests which would enable a 3D-aware semantic web with the GeoSPARQL standard as its core.
 
-== Preface
 
-To come...
+.Preface
 
-== Keywords
+[NOTE]
+====
+Insert Preface Text here. Give OGC specific commentary: describe the technical content, reason for document, history of the document and precursors, and plans for future work.
+
+There are two ways to specify the Preface: "simple clause" or "full clasuse"
+
+If the Preface does not contain subclauses, it is considered a simple preface clause. This one is entered as text after the `.Preface` label and must be placed between the AsciiDoc document attributes and the first AsciiDoc section title. It should not be give a section title of its own.
+
+If the Preface contains subclauses, it needs to be encoded as a full preface clause. This one is recognized as a full Metanorma AsciiDoc section with te title "Preface", i.e. `== Preface`. (Simple preface content can also be encoded like full preface.) 
+
+====
 
-To come...
 
 == Security Considerations
 
-The following security considerations apply...
+No security considerations have been made for this Whitepaper.
 
+[.preface]
 == Submitters
+All questions regarding this submission should be directed to the editor or the submitters:
 
 |===
 |Name |Affiliation |OGC member
 
 |Nicholas J. Car | KurrawongAI | Yes
-|===
+|===
+
+[.preface]
+== Contributors
+
+//This clause is optional.
+
+Additional contributors to this Standard include the following:
+
+Individual name(s), Organization
+
+[NOTE]
+====
+If you need to place any further sections in the preface area
+use the `[.preface]` attribute.
+====

document/sections/03a-motivation.adoc

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 == Motivation
 
+This section summarizes motivations of different parties for the extension of GeoSPARQL regarding 3D capabilities. 
+
 === Why do we want 3D semantic modeling?
 The white paper: "OGC Benefits of Representing Spatial Data Using Semantic and Graph Technologies" describes the beneficiaries and benefits of representing data, including geospatial data, using semantic and graph technologies <<Abhayaratna2020wp>>. This section describes the motivation of adding 3D functionality to the GeoSPARQL standard. 
 

document/sections/03b-related-work.adoc

@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ Finally, <<CHADZYNSKI2021100106>> proposed OntoCityGML, an extension go the City
 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546821000574?via%3Dihub
 Semantic 3D City Database — An enabler for a dynamic geospatial knowledge graph
 
-
-
 Other details and history of Onto CityGML.
 
 CityRDF working group https://github.com/ogcincubator/cityrdf