-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
fix(revive): handle transaction hash conflicts during re-org #10950
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+76
−13
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
| title: 'fix(revive): handle transaction hash conflicts during re-org' | ||
| doc: | ||
| - audience: Runtime Dev | ||
| description: "## Summary\n\nFixes a UNIQUE constraint violation when processing\ | ||
| \ blocks after a re-org:\n```\nUNIQUE constraint failed: transaction_hashes.transaction_hash\n\ | ||
| ```\n\n## Problem\n\nWhen a blockchain re-org occurs:\n1. Block A contains transaction\ | ||
| \ TX1 \u2192 stored in `transaction_hashes`\n2. Server restarts (clearing the\ | ||
| \ in-memory `block_number_to_hashes` map)\n3. Re-org happens, Block B (different\ | ||
| \ hash) now contains the same TX1\n4. INSERT fails because TX1 already exists\ | ||
| \ with old block_hash" | ||
| crates: | ||
| - name: pallet-revive-eth-rpc | ||
| bump: patch |
12 changes: 0 additions & 12 deletions
12
...ive/rpc/.sqlx/query-5c0ea8efbd2591e3ede3833acfcadf2d552140a20d84edbf90583da4619bcf2a.json
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions
12
...ive/rpc/.sqlx/query-b296f5ac320c7537133dca1ede0285ccf101a8e36d68455e05a76df3b366420e.json
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or it is ok to have block A still sitting in the table?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good point we can check in another PR, if we do clean up forked blocks