add buffer to remove external attributes #572
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
EtienneLt
commented
Oct 10, 2025
...lient/src/main/java/com/powsybl/network/store/client/ExternalAttributesCollectionBuffer.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <[email protected]>
EtienneLt
force-pushed
the
add-buffer-for-limits-groups-and-extensions
branch
from
def6e79 to
5ddd9fe
Compare
|
8 tasks
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
no
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
feature
What is the current behavior?
each time a operational limits group or a extension is deleted, the server is called
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
call the server only once delete all limits groups and extension when flushing
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?