Ranking criteria allow mapset host to indicate possession in a difficulty name

[Okorin]

Forum thread with conclusions:
https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/topics/2052052

Since the difficulty name rules were a bit spread out we are attempting to reword the following into a Guideline:

DELETED:

A beatmap host cannot indicate possession in a difficulty's name. (e.g. Beatmap Host's Insane). Conflicts caused by beatmapping multiple songs with the same metadata and collaborative difficulties are the only exceptions. Guest difficulties, however, may indicate possession with its creators' username or nickname.

MERGED INTO THE GUIDELINE:

Avoid incomprehensible username combinations to indicate possession of a collaborative difficulty. If it's unclear whose usernames are combined, simplification is recommended.

Avoid difficulty names with descriptive elements not clearly related to a guest difficulty creator or a level of difficulty. (e.g. Beatmap Creator's Tragic Love Extra)

The current wording takes the feedback given in https://osu.ppy.sh/community/forums/posts/9841035 into account

[Okorin]

BTW how is it not pointing out a conflict on en.md

[Okorin]

ah, got it, it had no overlapping wording anywhere so it is just conflict-less

[Walavouchey]

Suggested change

	- **The host should not include difficulties such as `Host's Insane`, unless this is done in order to rank the same metadata twice or strongly encouraged by a naming scheme related to the song.**
	If it is unclear, a discussion should be held to come to a consensus on whether the difficulty name can be used or should be changed.
	- **The host should not include difficulties such as `Host's Insane`, unless this is done in order to rank the same metadata twice or strongly encouraged by a naming scheme related to the song.** If it is unclear, a discussion should be held to come to a consensus on whether the difficulty name can be used or should be changed.

that or

- **Difficulty names should not be misleading.** If it is unclear, a discussion should be held to come to a consensus on whether the difficulty name can be used or should be changed.

not sure which one was meant here

[Okorin]

both suggestions are wrong, they are supposed to visually be on the same level as Difficulty names should not be misleading as you've guessed

[Okorin]

to specify: the sentence was at the end and under the list because if none of the bulletpoints apply to your usecase and you're not sure, have a discussion before ranking the map was the idea, moving it up kinda makes it read worse to me

[peppy]

what does "rank the same metadata twice" mean? it's very weird terminology.

[Okorin]

@peppy ppy/osu-stable-issues#714 basically this usecase is when people are generally fine with including themselves as a difficulty owner in the format Host's <Difficulty Level>

i.e.

• https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/474731#osu/1014240 Ranked in July 2016
• https://osu.ppy.sh/beatmapsets/488619#osu/1045500 Ranked in September 2016 had to use Doormat's Easy to avoid osu! thinking the difficulty is from the ranked set

I didn't know a better way to word this while keeping it brief. Maybe I should elaborate in a footnote?