Skip to content

Conversation

pavoljuhas
Copy link
Collaborator

Executed check/format-incremental --all --apply

Related to #4863

Executed  check/format-incremental --all --apply

Related to quantumlib#4863
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.14%. Comparing base (0f652e1) to head (1d7b889).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7195      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.14%   98.14%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1100     1100              
  Lines       96191    96146      -45     
==========================================
- Hits        94409    94363      -46     
- Misses       1782     1783       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@daxfohl
Copy link
Collaborator

daxfohl commented Mar 27, 2025

Anything in https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/blob/main/docs/dev/development.md or https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/blob/main/docs/dev/style.md that should be updated? I didn't see anything offhand for this, but I didn't look that closely. (The type annotations section will have to be updated as part of the unquoting project though.)

@mhucka
Copy link
Contributor

mhucka commented Mar 27, 2025

Anything in main/docs/dev/development.md or main/docs/dev/style.md that should be updated? I didn't see anything offhand for this, but I didn't look that closely. (The type annotations section will have to be updated as part of the unquoting project though.)

Good question.

I have a PR waiting in the wings (#7175) so if any changes are needed, it would be better to coordinate (or merge the PR and then do another set of changes for this issue).

@mhucka
Copy link
Contributor

mhucka commented Mar 27, 2025

I took a look just now too. In docs/dev/development.md, I think the text in "Continuous integration and local testing", which mentions using format-incremental, is probably enough for that.

For docs/dev/style.md, I think it would make sense to add some words about sorting imports in the section on 'Import statements". @pavoljuhas I could do that in PR #7175 or you could do that as part of this PR – what would be best?

Copy link
Contributor

@mhucka mhucka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, with a minor question about whether some text should be added to docs/dev/style.md as part of this PR.

@pavoljuhas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

LGTM, with a minor question about whether some text should be added to docs/dev/style.md as part of this PR.

I think it is better to update style.md in a separate PR. Here it would be hidden between 600+ modified files; it is also better to keep this change all tool generated only.

Thanks for a quick review!

@pavoljuhas pavoljuhas added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 27, 2025
Merged via the queue into quantumlib:main with commit 250f129 Mar 27, 2025
39 checks passed
@pavoljuhas pavoljuhas deleted the sort-import-statements branch March 27, 2025 20:59
@mhucka
Copy link
Contributor

mhucka commented Mar 27, 2025

I think it is better to update style.md in a separate PR. Here it would be hidden between 600+ modified files; it is also better to keep this change all tool generated only.

@pavoljuhas I added some text to PR #7175, specifically in commit 83cdba6. Hopefully the changes are clear and accurate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants