Skip to content

oracle contracts fix ci #1020

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yohanelly95
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

SkandaBhat and others added 4 commits April 4, 2022 12:03
* fix: updated and added comments in stakeManager and interface

* fix: updated and added comments on contracts

* fix: updated comment in collectionManager contract
Signed-off-by: yohanelly95 <[email protected]>
@yohanelly95 yohanelly95 changed the title Yohan/raz 1238 oracle contracts fix ci oracle contracts fix ci Feb 19, 2025
Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

@yohanelly95 yohanelly95 changed the base branch from release-v2 to main February 19, 2025 04:34
Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there! 👨‍🚀 Aldrin here to review your PR! Let me break this down for you! 🚀

Overall Summary

This PR primarily focuses on updating GitHub Actions dependencies and adding missing documentation in the StakeManager contract. The changes are mostly maintenance-related, upgrading various action versions to their latest stable releases.

Issues Found

⚠️ Missing Node.js Version Strategy
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
  with:
    node-version: 16

While upgrading to setup-node@v4 is good, Node.js 16 has reached end-of-life. Consider upgrading to an active LTS version.

Suggested fix:

- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
  with:
    node-version: 20
⚠️ Inconsistent Node.js Versions

The CI workflow uses Node.js 16 while the release workflow uses Node.js 20. This inconsistency could lead to unexpected behavior.

Recommendation: Standardize Node.js version across all workflows.

⚠️ Documentation Enhancement Needed
/**
 * @param stakerId Id of the staker for whom you want to get the maturity
 * @return maturity of staker
 */
function _getMaturity(uint32 stakerId) internal view returns (uint256)

While the added @param documentation is good, the @return tag could be more descriptive about what "maturity" represents and its units.

Suggested enhancement:

/**
 * @param stakerId Id of the staker for whom you want to get the maturity
 * @return The maturity timestamp in seconds since epoch for the given staker
 */

Reviewed Files

  1. .github/workflows/ci.yml
  2. .github/workflows/release.yml
  3. contracts/Core/StakeManager.sol

Positive Feedback

🌟 Great job on:

  • Keeping GitHub Actions up-to-date with latest versions
  • Adding missing parameter documentation in the Solidity contract
  • Maintaining consistent formatting throughout the changes
  • Using persist-workspace action consistently across jobs

Additional Recommendations

  1. Consider adding a .nvmrc or similar file to enforce consistent Node.js versions across workflows
  2. Document the reason for using persist-workspace in the workflow comments
  3. Consider adding changelog entries for dependency updates

Keep up the great work! 🚀 Let me know if you need any clarification on the suggested changes!

Over and out! 🌎


Review generated by: anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet

Signed-off-by: yohanelly95 <[email protected]>
Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there! 👨‍🚀 Aldrin here to review your PR! Let me break this down for you! 🚀

Overall Summary

This PR primarily focuses on updating CI/CD configuration and adding missing documentation. The changes include:

  • Upgrading GitHub Actions dependencies to newer versions
  • Updating Node.js version from 16 to 18
  • Adding missing documentation in StakeManager.sol
  • No breaking changes identified

Issues Found

⚠️ Missing Complete Documentation in StakeManager.sol
/**
 * @param stakerId Id of the staker for whom you want to get the maturity
 * @return maturity of staker
 */
function _getMaturity(uint32 stakerId) internal view returns (uint256)

While the addition of the @param documentation is good, the function documentation could be more comprehensive. Consider adding:

  • A function description
  • More detailed return value description
  • @dev section if there are implementation details worth noting

Suggested improvement:

/**
 * @notice Calculates the maturity period for a given staker
 * @dev Internal function used to determine staking maturity
 * @param stakerId Id of the staker for whom you want to get the maturity
 * @return maturity The maturity timestamp for the staker's stake
 */
function _getMaturity(uint32 stakerId) internal view returns (uint256)
⚠️ Potential GitHub Token Security Consideration
- name: Checkout
  uses: actions/checkout@v4
  with:
    token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

While not strictly an issue, it's worth noting that the GITHUB_TOKEN is automatically provided by GitHub Actions. Explicitly specifying it isn't necessary unless you need specific token permissions. Consider removing the token parameter if default permissions are sufficient.

Reviewed Files

  1. .github/workflows/ci.yml
  2. .github/workflows/release.yml
  3. contracts/Core/StakeManager.sol

Positive Feedback

🌟 Great job on:

  • Keeping dependencies up-to-date with security patches
  • Upgrading to Node.js 18 for better performance and security
  • Adding missing documentation
  • Maintaining consistent formatting across files
  • Using the latest versions of GitHub Actions
  • Setting up comprehensive CI pipeline with tests, scenarios, linting, coverage, and security scanning

Additional Recommendations

  1. 💡 Consider adding a PR description and linking relevant issues for better context
  2. 💡 Consider adding changeset files if this is a significant update
  3. 💡 It might be worth documenting the Node.js version upgrade in the project's documentation

Overall, this is a solid maintenance PR! Keep up the great work! 🚀


Review generated by: anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet

Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

Signed-off-by: yohanelly95 <[email protected]>
Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

Signed-off-by: yohanelly95 <[email protected]>
Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

Signed-off-by: yohanelly95 <[email protected]>
Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

rajkharvar
rajkharvar previously approved these changes Feb 24, 2025
ashish10677
ashish10677 previously approved these changes Mar 11, 2025
Signed-off-by: yohanelly95 <[email protected]>
@yohanelly95 yohanelly95 dismissed stale reviews from ashish10677 and rajkharvar via f158a12 March 19, 2025 05:12
Copy link

@astronaut-aldrin astronaut-aldrin bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Error during code review: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants