feat(ssr): make SSR compiler recognize lwc:on directive @W-18158832#5377
Merged
divmain merged 2 commits intosalesforce:masterfrom May 30, 2025
Merged
feat(ssr): make SSR compiler recognize lwc:on directive @W-18158832#5377divmain merged 2 commits intosalesforce:masterfrom
divmain merged 2 commits intosalesforce:masterfrom
Conversation
Make SSR compiler recognize lwc:on directive. Also adds snapshot and hydration tests to verify lwc:on used in SSR context
Contributor
Author
|
hydration code was already added in #5344 |
divmain
approved these changes
May 30, 2025
Contributor
divmain
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry it took me so long to review and approve. Thank you!
Contributor
|
/nucleus test |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Make SSR compiler recognize lwc:on directive. Also adds snapshot and hydration tests to verify lwc:on used in SSR context
Details
Does this pull request introduce a breaking change?
Does this pull request introduce an observable change?
GUS work item
W-18158832