-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
Leakage modeling: bugfixes for wildcard error and gauge optimization #671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rileyjmurray
wants to merge
10
commits into
bugfix
Choose a base branch
from
resolve-issue-652-smaller-scope-bugfix
base: bugfix
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…obust to different labelings of the idenity gate, and make the returned model`s default_gauge_group have a direct sum structure; make the default leakage gaugeopt suite 2-stage, where the second stage is over the default gauge group in the target model)
rileyjmurray
commented
Oct 18, 2025
…Have lagoified_gopparams_dicts apply the direct sum group by default, since apparently the target model stored in list-of-dicts representation of `stdgaugeopt` suite overrides my attempt at setting the default gauge group
…pecific gate causes leakage
…orrectness test for leakage GST.
|
@coreyostrove I believe this is ready for review. When this guy is merged I can get to work on finalizing #669, which targets develop. Once that guy is merged I'll do the expansion of general leakage modeling functionality. That PR will include an overhaul of some functions in gaugeopt.py to avoid awkward use of ExplicitOpModelCalc. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is split off from #664. It fixes how wildcard error is computed in leakage modeling. When merged it will resolve #652. It also includes changes to the default leakage-aware gauge optimization suite. The latter changes are needed to prevent gauge optimization from trying to spurriously "spread out" relational errors across available gates.
This PR adds a meaningful correctness test for leakage GST modeling. To reduce the time of the test I used a huge number of shots per circuit in the simulated dataset. This led to errors with "min_prob_clip" constants in objective function evaluation. In order to resolve those errors I replaced hard-coded instances of that constant's default value (1e-4) to values of a module-wide constant; I made similar changes for "radius" constants in objective functions.
(This PR is a superset of the since-closed PR #670, which started from develop instead of bugfix.)