Skip to content

Added an option to define the path of the singularity executable #689

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025

Conversation

muffato
Copy link
Contributor

@muffato muffato commented Apr 9, 2025

Hi @vsoch

I'm trying to clean up my local branches. I found this one that has a small commit.
This is about adding an option to define where is singularity. It can be used on sites where singularity is not necessarily in the $PATH of all users or when it is not provided as a module.

@@ -203,6 +203,11 @@ variable replacement. A summary table of variables is included below, and then f
* - singularity_module
- if defined, add to module script to load this Singularity module first
- null
* - podman_module
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should podman module be here? The singularity path addition is fantastic - great for security too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I noticed it was missing from the doc and thought I'd squeeze that in :)

Copy link
Member

@vsoch vsoch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, this looks good then! Please bump the version and add a note to the CHANGELOG.md and we should be good to merge.

@muffato
Copy link
Contributor Author

muffato commented Apr 11, 2025

Done !

@vsoch vsoch merged commit fbcfa1e into singularityhub:main Apr 11, 2025
10 checks passed
@muffato muffato deleted the singularity_path branch April 12, 2025 00:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants