beholder: pass OTel providers to chipingress client #1614
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
product-security-plaid-production
bot
requested review from
4of9,
engnke,
fouadkada,
hendoxc,
jmank88,
kirqz23 and
thomaska
✅ API Diff Results - No breaking changes |
pkcll
force-pushed
the
INFOPLAT-3070-chip-ingress-otel-metrics-tracing-bump-for-beholder
branch
from
f553ec3 to
2ae295a
Compare
jmank88
previously approved these changes
Oct 15, 2025
hendoxc
previously approved these changes
Oct 15, 2025
pkcll
force-pushed
the
INFOPLAT-3070-chip-ingress-otel-metrics-tracing-bump-for-beholder
branch
from
2ae295a to
1f1b64c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pass MeterProvider and TracerProvider from beholder to chipingress client for unified observability.
Related PR: #1613
Jira: INFOPLAT-3070