Skip to content

Conversation

@mrburke00
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrburke00 mrburke00 commented Mar 6, 2025

Added documentation relevant to PR #38

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an optional configuration parameter to toggle between explicit resource limits and automatic scaling for resources such as GPUs, threads, and memory.
  • Documentation

    • Updated guidance on resource scaling with detailed instructions.
    • Added a debugging tip to help resolve issues with large job scheduling.
    • Improved formatting for enhanced clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 6, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation for the Snakemake Kubernetes executor plugin has been updated. A new optional parameter scale (defaulting to 0) has been added in the resource definition section. When set to 1, explicit resource limits for GPUs, threads, and memory are omitted, allowing the pods to scale automatically. Additionally, a debugging tip for large job scheduling has been included, and the resource definition formatting has been adjusted to include a comma after machine_type.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/further.md Added new optional scale parameter (default 0) to conditionally include/omit explicit resource limits; added a debugging tip for scheduling large jobs; adjusted formatting with a comma after machine_type.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ExecutorDoc
    User->>ExecutorDoc: Set resource definition parameters (including scale)
    ExecutorDoc-->>User: Evaluate `scale` parameter
    alt scale == 1
        ExecutorDoc-->>User: Omit explicit resource limits
    else scale == 0
        ExecutorDoc-->>User: Apply explicit resource limits for GPUs, threads, memory, etc.
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • johanneskoester

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/further.md (1)

54-56: Enhance Debugging Tip Clarity for Large Job Scheduling
In the debugging tips section, the description on line 56 could benefit from minor rephrasing for clarity. There appears to be a missing comma, and the phrase “scaling to very large jobs” might be reworded (e.g., “when scaling large jobs”) to sound less subjective. Please consider adjusting the sentence for improved readability and consistency with the rest of the document.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...y default configurations for Kubernetes clusters there is a limit range or some other ad...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[style] ~56-~56: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...sts and resource limits when scaling to very large jobs. Try setting scale=0 and ensurin...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9d2c7a and 1142b44.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/further.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/further.md

[uncategorized] ~38-~38: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... # Optional (default=1) ``` - gpu: the number of GPUs to be requested ...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~40-~40: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...le nodes with GPUs. - gpu_manufacturer: Specifies the GPU vendor. Use "nvidia" ...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... or "amd" for AMD GPUs. - machine_type: machine type for the GPU enabled node. ...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[style] ~43-~43: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period.
Context: ...include resource (GPU, threads, memory, etc) limits - those limits being equal to t...

(ETC_PERIOD)


[uncategorized] ~44-~44: The determiner “the” seems more likely in this context.
Context: ...qual to the resource requests. - If scale=1(the default), we omit the limits entirely. ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_DETERMINER)


[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...y default configurations for Kubernetes clusters there is a limit range or some other ad...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[style] ~56-~56: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...sts and resource limits when scaling to very large jobs. Try setting scale=0 and ensurin...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/further.md

39-39: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


42-42: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


42-42: Bare URL used
null

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


44-44: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


45-45: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: testing

Comment on lines +35 to +36
machine_type="n1-standard-16",
scale=0 # Optional (default=1)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Inconsistent Default Value for scale Parameter
The resource definition block on lines 35–36 shows scale=0 while the inline comment indicates “(default=1)”. This conflicts with both the PR summary and the subsequent bullet explanations. Please clarify and update the default value consistently throughout the documentation.

Comment on lines +43 to +45
- `scale`: variable allows us to conditionally include resource (GPU, threads, memory, etc) limits - those limits being equal to the resource requests.
- If `scale=1`(the default), we omit the limits entirely. This is how the plugin currently operates and will allow the pods to scale up as needed.
- If `scale=0` we explicitly set the resource limits for each requested resource type.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Clarify the scale Parameter Explanation and Fix Punctuation
The bullet points describing the scale parameter introduce an inconsistency: line 44 states “If scale=1 (the default)” but the resource declaration (and PR summary) imply that the default is 0. Additionally, the abbreviation “etc” on line 43 should end with a period (“etc.”). Please revise these statements to reflect the correct default value and improve punctuation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~43-~43: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period.
Context: ...include resource (GPU, threads, memory, etc) limits - those limits being equal to t...

(ETC_PERIOD)


[uncategorized] ~44-~44: The determiner “the” seems more likely in this context.
Context: ...qual to the resource requests. - If scale=1(the default), we omit the limits entirely. ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_DETERMINER)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

44-44: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


45-45: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)

@johanneskoester
Copy link
Contributor

Or maybe have a look whether coderabbit is correct with its comments @mrburke00.

@mrburke00
Copy link
Collaborator Author

coderabbit may have gotten confused. Everything looks alright to me.

Default = 1 -> allow plugin to maintain status quo and scale
Setting scale = 0 -> turn on the limits and thus turn off the scaling, not the default

@mrburke00 mrburke00 merged commit 1b668c1 into snakemake:main Mar 14, 2025
6 checks passed
johanneskoester pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.4.0](v0.3.2...v0.4.0)
(2025-04-04)


### Features

* use k8s job API and improve status check robustness in case of
injected containers
([#43](#43))
([1ff6927](1ff6927))


### Bug Fixes

* Added documentation for scale variable
([#40](#40))
([1b668c1](1b668c1))
* properly catch and report ApiExceptions
([#42](#42))
([92375e6](92375e6))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants