Skip to content

Clarify OAuth issuer checking documentation#12776

Open
won-seoop wants to merge 1 commit into
strimzi:mainfrom
won-seoop:12453-clarify-oauth-docs
Open

Clarify OAuth issuer checking documentation#12776
won-seoop wants to merge 1 commit into
strimzi:mainfrom
won-seoop:12453-clarify-oauth-docs

Conversation

@won-seoop
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Type of change

Documentation

Description

Clarifies the OAuth server-side configuration documentation for issuer checking.

When oauth.check.issuer="false" is used, oauth.valid.issuer.uri should not be configured. If oauth.valid.issuer.uri is configured, the issuer is checked against that value.

Closes #12453

Checklist

  • Write tests (N/A - documentation only)
  • Make sure all tests pass (make docu_check)
  • Update documentation
  • Check RBAC rights for Kubernetes / OpenShift roles (N/A - documentation only)
  • Try your changes from Pod inside your Kubernetes and OpenShift cluster, not just locally (N/A - documentation only)
  • Reference relevant issue(s) and close them after merging
  • Update CHANGELOG.md (N/A - documentation only)
  • Supply screenshots for visual changes, such as Grafana dashboards (N/A - documentation only)

Signed-off-by: halo <dongjin778@naver.com>
@snyk-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

snyk-io Bot commented May 29, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@scholzj scholzj added this to the 1.1.0 milestone May 29, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@scholzj scholzj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks.

@scholzj scholzj requested review from a team and mstruk May 29, 2026 08:43
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 29, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.18%. Comparing base (151b17d) to head (e971315).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12776      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     75.16%   75.18%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     6458     6459       +1     
============================================
  Files           346      346              
  Lines         24329    24329              
  Branches       3120     3120              
============================================
+ Hits          18287    18291       +4     
+ Misses         4808     4803       -5     
- Partials       1234     1235       +1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Docs]: Enhance documentation for field checkIssuer

3 participants