Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wip: refactor language service setup and usage #1271

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thecrypticace
Copy link
Contributor

Opening this up b/c I ended up accidentally doing a refactor (lol) and don't want to forget to merge it

This sets up architecture that should (eventually) help with more direct testing in the language service itself. My primary goal here is for the majority of language server tests to be able to run against both the language service and language server where it makes sense.

  • After merging, this must be released as major 0.x release (v0.16.x probably)
  • Play has to get updated to the new APIs

Base automatically changed from feat/source-not to main March 19, 2025 14:25
This will set us up for more direct, language-service specific testing.

This is very much a work in progress but the ultimate goal is for the majority of language server tests to be able to run against both the language service _and_ language server
Protocol v3.17 added support for pull-model diagnostics which are modeled as a “report” that is either a full set of diagnostics for a document (and related documents) or “unchanged”

We can convert these to the push model by pulling the diagnostics like we were doing before and inspecting the report before pushing diagnostics to the server
@thecrypticace thecrypticace force-pushed the feat/refactor-language-service-usage branch from bb0d657 to 379df94 Compare March 21, 2025 00:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant