-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Add ts-graphviz plugin to the remark plugins #15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the documentation and configuration for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Warning Tool Failures:Tool Failure Count:📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)package.json (2)
The added type definitions (@types/mdast, @types/unist) are appropriate for implementing a remark plugin that processes Markdown AST. Also applies to: 53-53, 54-54
The added dependencies (mdast-util-mdx-jsx, unified, unist-util-visit) provide the necessary utilities for implementing the ts-graphviz remark plugin. The version constraints using caret (^) align with the project's versioning strategy. Let's verify the compatibility of these packages with the project's Node.js version requirement: Also applies to: 57-57, 58-58 ✅ Verification successfulLet me try a different approach to verify the Node.js compatibility by checking the package.json files directly from the npm registry. Dependencies are compatible with project's Node.js requirements The project requires Node.js >=18.0, and none of the added packages ([email protected], [email protected], [email protected]) specify any conflicting Node.js engine requirements. Since these packages are widely used in the Node.js ecosystem and their latest versions are being used, they are compatible with Node.js 18+. The absence of explicit engine requirements in their package.json suggests they follow Node.js's LTS support policy. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify package compatibility with Node.js >=18.0
# Expected: All packages should list Node.js >=18.0 in their package.json
for pkg in mdast-util-mdx-jsx unified unist-util-visit; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
npm info $pkg engines.node
done
Length of output: 681 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Get package.json content for each package
for pkg in mdast-util-mdx-jsx unified unist-util-visit; do
echo "=== $pkg ==="
npm view $pkg engines --json 2>/dev/null || echo "No engines field specified"
echo "Version requirements:"
npm view $pkg version
done
# Also check our project's Node.js requirement
echo -e "\nProject Node.js requirement:"
grep '"node":' package.json || echo "No Node.js requirement specified in package.json"
Length of output: 879 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
i18n/ja/docusaurus-plugin-content-docs/current/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md (1)
11-18
: LGTM! The new read-only code block format is well-implemented.The example effectively demonstrates the TypeScript integration and type-safe attribute usage.
Consider adding inline comments to explain the attribute helper usage, as it's a key TypeScript feature. For example:
import { digraph, attribute as _ } from 'ts-graphviz'; const G = digraph('G', (g) => { + // Type-safe attribute access using the attribute helper g.node('A', { [_.color]: 'red' }); + // Edge creation with labeled connection g.edge(['A', 'B'], { [_.label]: 'A to B' }); });docusaurus.config.ts (2)
35-35
: Configuration looks good, consider documenting plugin options.The plugin configuration is consistently applied across docs, blog, and pages sections. The empty options object suggests default configuration is being used.
Consider adding documentation for available plugin options in the README or plugin documentation.
Also applies to: 44-44, 50-50
5-5
: Good architectural decision moving to a plugin-based approach.The shift from using
TSGraphvizLiveEditor
component to a remark plugin is a solid architectural choice because it:
- Centralizes the transformation logic
- Ensures consistent handling across all documentation sections
- Follows Docusaurus's recommended patterns for content transformation
Also applies to: 35-35, 44-44, 50-50
plugins/remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts (3)
8-8
: Define 'PluginOptions' type or remove it if unnecessaryThe
PluginOptions
type is currently an empty object{}
. If no options are needed for the plugin, consider removing this type. If options are expected in the future, define them explicitly to enhance code clarity.
89-89
: Consider importing 'unist-util-visit' staticallyCurrently,
unist-util-visit
is imported dynamically within the plugin function. Unless there's a specific reason for dynamic importing (like code-splitting for performance optimization), consider importing it statically at the top of the file to improve readability and reduce overhead.Apply the following change to import it statically:
- return async (root) => { - const { visit } = await import('unist-util-visit'); + import { visit } from 'unist-util-visit'; + + return (root) => {
121-121
: Update comment to reference the correct moduleThe comment mentions
require('npm2yarn')
, which seems unrelated to this plugin. This might be a leftover from a copy-paste. Update the comment to accurately reflect the current module to avoid confusion.Suggested change:
- // To continue supporting `require('npm2yarn')` without the `.default` ㄟ(▔,▔)ㄏ + // To continue supporting `require('remark-plugin-tsgraphviz')` without the `.default` ㄟ(▔,▔)ㄏ
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
docs/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md
(1 hunks)docusaurus.config.ts
(3 hunks)i18n/ja/docusaurus-plugin-content-docs/current/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md
(1 hunks)plugins/remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
i18n/ja/docusaurus-plugin-content-docs/current/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md (1)
11-18
: Verify consistent handling of code blocks across documentation.
The new ts-graphviz:read-only
tag is used in the first example but not in subsequent code blocks. Let's verify the plugin handles both cases correctly.
[^\n]ts-graphviz[^\n]\n[\s\S]*?```" --type md
Test 2: Specifically find read-only blocks
echo -e "\nChecking for read-only blocks:"
rg -U "[^\n]*ts-graphviz:read-only[^\n]*\n[\s\S]*?
" --type md
This will help determine if we need to standardize the code block format across all examples
<details>
<summary>✅ Verification successful</summary>
ts[- ]graphviz' --type md
# Find read-only blocks
echo -e "\nChecking for read-only blocks:"
rg -U '```ts[- ]graphviz:read-only' --type md
# Look for any TypeScript code blocks in the docs to compare
echo -e "\nChecking for general TypeScript blocks:"
rg -U '```ts(?!.*graphviz)' --type md
'
echo -e "\nChecking content of the specific file:"
cat "i18n/ja/docusaurus-plugin-content-docs/current/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md"
---
After examining the file content, I can now generate a final response:
**Code block tags are used consistently and appropriately in the documentation**
The documentation follows a clear pattern where:
- The first code block uses `ts-graphviz:read-only` tag as it's the primary example demonstrating TypeScript integration
- Subsequent code blocks use regular `typescript` tags as they show different implementation approaches and don't require the read-only feature
This is intentional and correct, as the first example is meant to demonstrate IDE features (like hovering), while later examples focus on showing different API usage patterns.
</details>
<details>
<summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary>
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in code block usage across documentation
# Test 1: Find all ts-graphviz code blocks
echo "Checking for ts-graphviz code blocks:"
rg -U "
Length of output: 178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach with proper escaping and simpler patterns
# Find all code blocks with ts-graphviz
echo "Checking for ts-graphviz code blocks:"
rg -U '
Length of output: 178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with simpler ripgrep patterns and proper string handling
echo "Checking all markdown files for code blocks:"
rg --type md -l '
Length of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific file directly
cat "i18n/ja/docusaurus-plugin-content-docs/current/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md"
Length of output: 2740
docs/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md (2)
14-21
: Well-structured example demonstrating TypeScript integration!
The code example effectively demonstrates:
- Type-safe attribute usage with the
attribute
import - Clear graph construction using the declarative API
- Proper TypeScript imports and syntax
14-15
: Verify the new code block syntax implementation.
The new ts-graphviz:read-only
syntax has been introduced. Let's verify that the remark plugin correctly processes this syntax.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the remark plugin implementation to verify the syntax handling.
Let me search for the remark plugin implementation to verify the syntax handling.
Let me check the content of the remark plugin file to verify the implementation.
Based on the code inspection, I can now provide a final response:
The ts-graphviz:read-only
syntax is properly implemented and supported.
The remark plugin (plugins/remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts) correctly handles the syntax by:
- Detecting code blocks with meta starting with
ts-graphviz
- Parsing the
read-only
option from the meta string - Transforming the code block into a
TSGraphvizLiveEditor
component with appropriate props - The plugin is properly configured in docusaurus.config.ts for docs, blog, and pages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the remark plugin implementation for ts-graphviz:read-only syntax
# Test 1: Check if the plugin file exists and handles this syntax
rg -A 5 "ts-graphviz:read-only"
# Test 2: Look for the plugin's syntax handling implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'ts-graphviz:read-only'
Length of output: 1245
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for remark plugin files related to ts-graphviz
fd -e js -e ts remark
# Look for code block language handling in these files
rg -A 5 "lang|language.*ts-graphviz"
# Check package.json for remark plugin configuration
cat package.json | grep -A 10 "remark"
Length of output: 329090
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for remark plugin files and their content
fd -e js -e ts remark-plugin-tsgraphviz
rg -A 5 "ts-graphviz:read-only" plugins/remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts
Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the remark plugin file
cat plugins/remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts
# Also search for any configuration in docusaurus config
rg -A 5 "remarkPlugins" docusaurus.config.ts
Length of output: 3957
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
plugins/remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts (3)
5-6
: Consider expanding the PluginOptions type definition.The empty
PluginOptions
type with a biome-ignore directive suggests future extensibility, but it might be better to define at least the basic plugin configuration options now.Consider defining some basic options:
-// biome-ignore lint/complexity/noBannedTypes: Preliminary implementation for future extensibility. -type PluginOptions = {}; +type PluginOptions = { + /** Whether to import TSGraphvizLiveEditor automatically */ + autoImport?: boolean; + /** Default options for all code blocks */ + defaults?: CodeBlockOptions; +};
55-83
: Consider making the import path configurable.The import path '@site/src/components/TSGraphvizLiveEditor' is hardcoded in
createImportNode
. This might cause issues if the component location changes or if users want to provide their own editor component.Consider making it configurable through plugin options:
-function createImportNode() { +function createImportNode(importPath = '@site/src/components/TSGraphvizLiveEditor') { return { type: 'mdxjsEsm', value: - "import TSGraphvizLiveEditor from '@site/src/components/TSGraphvizLiveEditor'", + `import TSGraphvizLiveEditor from '${importPath}'`, // ... rest of the node creation }; }
85-117
: Consider optimizing the node transformation loop.The current implementation uses a while loop with manual index management. This could be simplified using array methods.
Consider this alternative approach:
if (isParent(node)) { - let index = 0; - while (index < node.children.length) { - const child = node.children[index]!; - if (isTSGraphvizScript(child)) { - const result = transformNode(child); - node.children.splice(index, 1, ...result); - index += result.length; - transformed = true; - } else { - index += 1; - } - } + const newChildren: Node[] = []; + node.children.forEach(child => { + if (isTSGraphvizScript(child)) { + newChildren.push(...transformNode(child)); + transformed = true; + } else { + newChildren.push(child); + } + }); + node.children = newChildren; }This approach is more functional and easier to understand.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
plugins/remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
plugins/remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts (1)
36-47
: LGTM! Well-defined type guards.
The type guard functions are properly implemented with correct type predicates and safe null checking.
This pull request includes significant updates to the documentation and introduces a new plugin for handling
ts-graphviz
code blocks in markdown files. The changes improve the way code examples are displayed and enhance the documentation configuration.Documentation Updates:
docs/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.mdx
todocs/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md
and updated the code block for better readability.i18n/ja/docusaurus-plugin-content-docs/current/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.mdx
toi18n/ja/docusaurus-plugin-content-docs/current/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md
and similarly updated the code block.Configuration Changes:
docusaurus.config.ts
to include the newtsgraphviz
remark plugin for processingts-graphviz
code blocks.Plugin Introduction:
remark-plugin-tsgraphviz.ts
to transformts-graphviz
code blocks intoTSGraphvizLiveEditor
components, making the code examples interactive and read-only. I have added the ts-graphviz plugin to the remark plugins in order to enable the rendering of graph visualizations in the documentation. This will enhance the user experience and provide better understanding of the code examples.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ts-graphviz
library with improved code block formatting for TypeScript examples.Bug Fixes
TSGraphvizLiveEditor
component to streamline examples.Documentation