Fixed typo

[ez-me]

Description

Some words in documents referenced chrome or cromite when in reality they were meant to refer to cromite and bromite, respectively.

All submissions

• there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
• Bromite can be built with these changes
• I have tested that the new change works as intended (AVD or physical device will do)

Format

• patch subject and filename match (e.g. Subject: Alternative cache (NIK-based) -> Alternative-cache-NIK-based.patch)
• patch description contains explanation of changes
• no unnecessary whitespace or unrelated changes

[ez-me]

I know this isn't a code change and I'm okay if you do this yourself and not add me to the contributors list.

[ghost]

Are you sure this can be changed? In Chromium-based browsers, you often have to use the term "Chrome" or "Chromium," even if the browser itself has a different name.

[ez-me]

Later in the readme it's stated:

Now, run sudo apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/cromite to apply the changes.

And I get what you are saying, as it's for the name of the binary (chrome in the example), but I use Arch's AUR package and there the binary name is indeed cromite, so maybe the second mention of the file should need changing, or the entire section should have a "your cromite binary may have a different name (chrome, chromium, cromite), make sure to use that one" or similar.

[ghost]

Cromite. With a capital letter in the beginning.

[ez-me]

cromite's predecessor was Cromite?

I changed it to bromite because that's what made sense to me

[ghost]

Sorry, I meant "Bromite". But Bromite with a capital letter.