perf(turbopack): use trace_span in tracing::instrument, improve by 1x - #2469
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @xusd320, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on optimizing the tracing instrumentation within Turbopack by adjusting the verbosity of several Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request improves performance by changing several info_span! macro calls to trace_span!. This is a good optimization as it reduces tracing overhead in default configurations by moving these spans to a more verbose tracing level.
I've made a few suggestions to improve consistency in how trace_span! is used across the modified files. By importing the macro at the top of each file, the code becomes more uniform and slightly easier to read.
Overall, the changes are correct and effectively address the goal of improving performance.
| output_assets: OperationVc<OutputAssets>, | ||
| ) -> Result<()> { | ||
| let span = tracing::info_span!("emitting"); | ||
| let span = tracing::trace_span!("emitting"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For consistency with other files in this PR (e.g., crates/pack-api/src/app.rs), consider importing trace_span at the top of the file and using it directly without the tracing:: prefix. This would make the style for using tracing spans uniform across the codebase.
// at the top of the file
use tracing::{Instrument, trace_span};
// ...
// here
let span = trace_span!("emitting");
Follow #2468
Improve
tracing spaninnext.js