Skip to content

Conversation

@Shrutim1505
Copy link
Member

@Shrutim1505 Shrutim1505 commented Feb 15, 2025

image

I guess it looks better in preview

@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign william-wang
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @william-wang in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 15, 2025
Signed-off-by: Shruti78 <[email protected]>

fixed docs alignment in mobile view

Signed-off-by: Shruti78 <[email protected]>

fixed docs alignment in mobile view

Signed-off-by: Shruti78 <[email protected]>

fixed responsiveness

Signed-off-by: Shruti78 <[email protected]>

 layout/fix

Signed-off-by: Shruti78 <[email protected]>

code updation

Signed-off-by: Shruti78 <[email protected]>

remove extra padding

Signed-off-by: Shruti78 <[email protected]>

change background colour

Signed-off-by: Shruti78 <[email protected]>
@Shrutim1505
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @william-wang

@Shrutim1505
Copy link
Member Author

Shrutim1505 commented Feb 15, 2025

@Arhell @kevin-wangzefeng @Monokaix check this one

@Shrutim1505 Shrutim1505 mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2025
@Monokaix
Copy link
Member

It seems grayer.

Copy link
Member

@Arhell Arhell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Shrutim1505 the same problem as described here #358 (comment)

@Shrutim1505
Copy link
Member Author

@Arhell ok I will remember it next time.

@Shrutim1505
Copy link
Member Author

@Arhell @Monokaix is this change viable??

@Arhell
Copy link
Member

Arhell commented Feb 17, 2025

I don't see the point in this change, except maybe the shadow could be increased a bit in these blocks.

and don't forget about testing

1

@Shrutim1505
Copy link
Member Author

I don't see the point in this change, except maybe the shadow could be increased a bit in these blocks.

and don't forget about testing

1

ok

@Arhell
Copy link
Member

Arhell commented Feb 17, 2025

Just in case, maybe you didn't know Preview here
1

but not all projects have this.

@Shrutim1505 Shrutim1505 marked this pull request as draft February 17, 2025 12:54
@Shrutim1505
Copy link
Member Author

Shrutim1505 commented Feb 17, 2025

Just in case, maybe you didn't know Preview here 1

but not all projects have this.

Ok @Arhell
I have seen the deployed link. However, I feel changes are not reliable.
I would have a better approach to this then.
Thanks for correcting me.

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 22, 2025
@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Shrutim1505: PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants