Refine Expiration of Charter Refinement #1011
Conversation
* Define extensions explicitly as decisions, which clarifies that they can be appealed if necessary. * Clarify that failing to extend is de facto abandonment. * Move paragraph for better cohesion.
frivoal
added
Agenda+
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
|
Per 4.2, there is an 8-week window for objecting to a decision to abandon the proposal. The window starts with the announcement of the decision to abandon the proposal. I read the text proposed in this pull request as suggesting there could be a decision without an announcement. Even if one might conclude that the start of the 8-week window is the last day of the announced refinement period, it seems simpler to require an announcement in all 3 decision cases. |
|
@ianbjacobs , this may not be apparent from the text, and if so we should tweak further, but (a) Yes, I agree that an announcement of extension should be required at the end of the period if we're neither moving to ac review nor abandoning, however, (b) given that a duration is announced ahead of time, and that missing deadlines is not especially hard to imagine, I think it does make sense to say what happens if the period expires with no decision. I think the PR as it is does (b) reasonably well, but it might need another pass to do (a) well. |
Preview | Diff