Skip to content

Conversation

@franconi
Copy link
Contributor

@franconi franconi commented Jan 21, 2026

As per issue #173


Preview | Diff

@franconi franconi requested review from afs, doerthe and pfps January 21, 2026 17:17
@franconi franconi added the ms:CR Milestone: Candidate Recommendation label Jan 21, 2026
@franconi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closes #173

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 22, 2026

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 22, 2026

Is there going to be a follow-up to this PR to remove the definition of RDF Dataset (being updated by #172)?

This PR makes it redundant. The RDF Datasets Definition includes notation such as:

... { G, (, G1), (, G2), . . . (, Gn) } ...

which is only in RDF Semantics because the notation is used for RDF Dataset merge.

@franconi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there going to be a follow-up to this PR to remove the definition of RDF Dataset (being updated by #172)?

This PR makes it redundant. The RDF Datasets Definition includes notation such as:

... { G, (, G1), (, G2), . . . (, Gn) } ...

which is only in RDF Semantics because the notation is used for RDF Dataset merge.

Right. I am removing the definition in this PR, making PR #172 redundant.

@franconi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Removed the RDF Datasets Definition.

@franconi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closes PR #172

@franconi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Display: https://rawcdn.githack.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/118ed502cba827bd14badec4c4103bc687a3d06a/spec/index.html#rdf_datasets

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Jan 22, 2026

It appears to me that this definition would remove from the default graph any triple that was also in any named graph.

Why not use the previous definition plus the initial standardize apart and replace merge with union, although they are the same as there are no shared blank node names.

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 22, 2026

It appears to me that this definition would remove from the default graph any triple that was also in any named graph.

Use "" as a label for the default graphs.

@franconi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I used the special label "default" as label for the default graph. Committed.

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Jan 22, 2026

Yes, but why all this new way of doing things when the old way worked fine with the addition of the standardize apart initial step?

@franconi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, but why all this new way of doing things when the old way worked fine with the addition of the standardize apart initial step?

It is much simpler, and it generalises to n datasets.

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 22, 2026

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 23, 2026

Rebased to main to integrate PR #171; resolve conflict; replace a use of tabs by spaces like the lines around it.

franconi and others added 5 commits January 28, 2026 22:18
Removed the definition of an RDF dataset from the HTML specification.
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jan 28, 2026

Conflicts resolved; #172 touches RDF Dataset definition whereas this PR removes that definition.

franconi and others added 2 commits January 29, 2026 12:19
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
@franconi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Preview: https://rawcdn.githack.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/1a96b5becc00eedf4c1b494349f91f0230e9a5de/spec/index.html#rdf_datasets

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ms:CR Milestone: Candidate Recommendation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants